These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10876357)

  • 1. Asymmetric effects on recognition of animate objects by children.
    Ando M; Hakoda Y
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):995-9. PubMed ID: 10876357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in recognition and impressions of animate and inanimate objects in which features are deleted or added.
    Ando M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1079-90. PubMed ID: 10939052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of asymmetric alterations to pictures of cats and geometric shapes: effects of method and type of alteration.
    Ando M
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):965-74. PubMed ID: 10876355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetric recognition of pictures of cats as a function of age in 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children.
    Ando M; Hakoda Y; Nakamura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):279-84. PubMed ID: 17037672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of asymmetric alterations to pictures of cats: effects of method of alteration and type of change in elderly subjects.
    Ando M; Hakoda Y; Ogasawara E; Shiihara Y; Otsubo M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Feb; 110(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 20391871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of animal recognition: a difference between Parts and Wholes.
    Davidoff J; Roberson D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Mar; 81(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 11884088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Very young children are insensitive to picture- but not object-orientation.
    Pierroutsakos SL; Deloache JS; Gound M; Bernard EN
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15985066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.
    Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects.
    Bushnell EW; Baxt C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1867-81. PubMed ID: 10641320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adults' and children's recognition of items added to or deleted from scenes: salience, complexity, and unnaturalness.
    Ando M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1113-21. PubMed ID: 10939055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition of items added to or deleted from scenes: method of alterations, type of alterations, and salience.
    Ando M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Feb; 94(1):327-32. PubMed ID: 11883582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.
    Viswanathan M; Childers TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):267-87. PubMed ID: 12705535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of color on children's naming of pictures.
    Johnson CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1091-101. PubMed ID: 7478863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. the role of dimensional distinctiveness in children's and adults' artifact categorization.
    Hammer R; Diesendruck G
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 15686580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.
    Wiggett AJ; Pritchard IC; Downing PE
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3111-7. PubMed ID: 19631673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual and verbal metaphors: developmental interactions.
    Dent C; Rosenberg L
    Child Dev; 1990 Aug; 61(4):983-94. PubMed ID: 2209201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facilitating children's understanding of misinterpretation: explanatory efforts and improvements in perspective taking.
    Pillow BH; Mash C; Aloian S; Hill V
    J Genet Psychol; 2002 Jun; 163(2):133-48. PubMed ID: 12095085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization.
    Zachariou V; Del Giacco AC; Ungerleider LG; Yue X
    J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 30458511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents.
    Uttal DH; Gentner D; Liu LL; Lewis AR
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):156-70. PubMed ID: 18171376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It's alive! animate motion captures visual attention.
    Pratt J; Radulescu PV; Guo RM; Abrams RA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1724-30. PubMed ID: 20974713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.