These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10876693)

  • 1. [Fifty years of plastic surgery in the Netherlands. IX. Reconstructive surgery illustrated by breast reconstruction].
    Jonasse Y; Werker PM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1152-6. PubMed ID: 10876693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?
    Leyngold MM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. PubMed ID: 29369109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lee KT; Mun GH
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.
    Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 10987463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap.
    Healy C; Allen RJ
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2014 Feb; 30(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 24163223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
    Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [APPLICATION VALUE OF INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAPHY IN FLAP RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY].
    Yang K; Mu L; Liu Y; Peng Z; Li G
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 29(9):1113-6. PubMed ID: 26750010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
    Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
    Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perioperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction surgery in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals.
    Masoomi H; Wirth GA; Paydar KZ; Richland BK; Evans GRD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Oct; 134(4):514e-520e. PubMed ID: 25357045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients.
    Kronowitz SJ; Robb GL; Youssef A; Reece G; Chang SH; Koutz CA; Ng RL; Lipa JE; Miller MJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Dec; 112(7):1768-78. PubMed ID: 14663219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Knight MA; Nguyen DT; Kobayashi MR; Evans GR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jun; 56(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 16721068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Free flap breast reconstruction: the LSU experience (1984-1996).
    Allen R; Guarda H; Wall F; Dupin C; Glass C
    J La State Med Soc; 1997 Oct; 149(10):388-92. PubMed ID: 9347636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques.
    Yueh JH; Slavin SA; Adesiyun T; Nyame TT; Gautam S; Morris DJ; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jun; 125(6):1585-1595. PubMed ID: 20517080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients.
    Hanwright PJ; Davila AA; Hirsch EM; Khan SA; Fine NA; Bilimoria KY; Kim JY
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):938-45. PubMed ID: 23769660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast reconstruction using perforator flaps.
    Granzow JW; Levine JL; Chiu ES; Allen RJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2006 Nov; 94(6):441-54. PubMed ID: 17061279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
    Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microvascular reconstruction of the breast.
    Serletti JM; Moran SL
    Semin Surg Oncol; 2000; 19(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 11135483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.