150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10877284)
1. Problems with audit in cervical cytology.
Womack C; Warren AY
Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):200-1. PubMed ID: 10877284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Problems with audit in cervical cytology.
Denton KJ
Cytopathology; 1999 Dec; 10(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 10607005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HPV testing in cervical cytology practice: it's all about choice.
Stoler MH
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 15839612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Managing incidents in the cervical screening programme.
Wilkinson MJ
Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 11014655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reclassification of negative smears as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in quality assurance reviews: implications and limitations.
Stanley DE; Plowden K; Sherman ME
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 87(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 10603187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
Weintraub D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Significance of sources of error and quality control in cytologic mass screening].
Zimmer S; Krahnert U; Munck C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 3591056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statement on technical devices for innovation in cervical cytology screening.
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 106(4):441. PubMed ID: 8853029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears.
Giles JA; Deery A; Crow J; Walker P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1067-70. PubMed ID: 2804009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Internal quality assurance in cervical cytology one laboratory's experience.
Cross PA
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8833871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance in cervical cytopathology.
Light AM
Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):290-2. PubMed ID: 9252748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
Herbert A
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening.
Faraker CA
Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8453016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [How technology and vaccination have changed the Pap test].
Bondi A; Ghidoni D; Amadori A
Pathologica; 1999 Feb; 91(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 10396949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Partial re-screening of all negative smears. A method of quality control of pathology department concerning smear screening against cervix cancer].
Jensen ML; Dybdahl H; Svanholm H
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3024-7. PubMed ID: 10850190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ABMSPs in cervical cytology.
Crossley J
Cytopathology; 2005 Feb; 16(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15859317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An explanation for the problem of false-negative cervical smears.
Barton SE; Jenkins D; Hollingworth A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Apr; 96(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 2751964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
