These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10877296)

  • 1. A chi-square goodness-of-fit analysis of dependent resource selection data.
    Dasgupta N; Alldredge JR
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):402-8. PubMed ID: 10877296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact goodness-of-fit tests for Markov chains.
    Besag J; Mondal D
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):488-96. PubMed ID: 23432148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
    Nattino G; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 32134502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing differences in proportions.
    Fisher MJ; Marshall AP; Mitchell M
    Aust Crit Care; 2011 May; 24(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21536451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 1992 Aug; 11(11):1511-9. PubMed ID: 1410963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A global goodness-of-fit statistic for Cox regression models.
    Parzen M; Lipsitz SR
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):580-4. PubMed ID: 11318217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smoothed Quantiles for
    Yuan KH; Gomer B; Marcoulides KM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):223-242. PubMed ID: 33400593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the goodness of fit in models of sparse medical data: a simulation approach.
    Boyle P; Flowerdew R; Williams A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 9222792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of several goodness-of-fit tests for the kappa statistic based on exact power and coverage probability.
    Basu S; Basu A
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 7746976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic.
    Altaye M; Donner A; Eliasziw M
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2479-88. PubMed ID: 11512137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On testing departure from the binomial and multinomial assumptions.
    Paul SR; Liang KY; Self SG
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):231-6. PubMed ID: 2720053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.
    Chun SY; Browne MW; Shapiro A
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28597361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian chi-squared goodness-of-fit test for censored data models.
    Cao J; Moosman A; Johnson VE
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):426-34. PubMed ID: 19645701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quadratic inference functions for varying-coefficient models with longitudinal data.
    Qu A; Li R
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 16918902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A goodness-of-fit test for capture-recapture model Mt under closure.
    Stanley TR; Burnham KP
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 11318189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hypertabastic survival model with other unimodal hazard rate functions using a goodness-of-fit test.
    Tahir MR; Tran QX; Nikulin MS
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1936-1945. PubMed ID: 28173610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing goodness of fit of a uniform truncation model.
    Mandel M; Betensky RA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 17688493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the homogeneity of kappa statistics.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M; Klar N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 8934591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.