These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10877314)

  • 1. Local estimation of age-dependent variance components from longitudinal twin data.
    Huggins R
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):537-45. PubMed ID: 10877314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximate solutions for the maximum-likelihood estimates in models of univariate human twin data.
    Wijesiri UW; Williams CJ
    Behav Genet; 1995 May; 25(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 7598664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models.
    Verhulst B; Prom-Wormley E; Keller M; Medland S; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2019 Jan; 49(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 30569348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of covariance patterns for longitudinal data in semi-parametric models.
    Li J; Wong WK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2010 Apr; 19(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 19153167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latent curve analyses of longitudinal twin data using a mixed-effects biometric approach.
    McArdle JJ
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):343-59. PubMed ID: 16790145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A modified pseudolikelihood approach for analysis of longitudinal data.
    Wang YG; Zhao Y
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):681-9. PubMed ID: 17825002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the covariance between parameter estimates in models of twin data.
    Williams CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):557-68. PubMed ID: 8369388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A penalized spline approach to functional mixed effects model analysis.
    Chen H; Wang Y
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):861-70. PubMed ID: 21155747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sum Scores in Twin Growth Curve Models: Practicality Versus Bias.
    Luningham JM; McArtor DB; Bartels M; Boomsma DI; Lubke GH
    Behav Genet; 2017 Sep; 47(5):516-536. PubMed ID: 28780665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models.
    Rijsdijk FV; Sham PC
    Brief Bioinform; 2002 Jun; 3(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 12139432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint mean-covariance random effect model for longitudinal data.
    Bai Y; Qian M; Tian M
    Biom J; 2020 Jan; 62(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 31544252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some covariance models for longitudinal count data with overdispersion.
    Thall PF; Vail SC
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):657-71. PubMed ID: 2242408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. General formulas for obtaining the MLEs and the asymptotic variance-covariance matrix in mapping quantitative trait loci when using the EM algorithm.
    Kao CH; Zeng ZB
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):653-65. PubMed ID: 9192455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of variance-function misspecification in analysis of longitudinal data.
    Wang YG; Lin X
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):413-21. PubMed ID: 16011687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance.
    Christian JC; Norton JA; Sorbel J; Williams CJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7713398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling nonstationary longitudinal data.
    Núñez-Antón V; Zimmerman DL
    Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 10985205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing for cubic smoothing splines under dependent data.
    Nummi T; Pan J; Siren T; Liu K
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):871-5. PubMed ID: 21210770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Longitudinal Data with Semiparametric Estimation of Covariance Function.
    Fan J; Huang T; Li R
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2007 Jun; 102(478):632-641. PubMed ID: 19707537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A smoothing-based goodness-of-fit test of covariance for functional data.
    Chen ST; Xiao L; Staicu AM
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):562-571. PubMed ID: 30450612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parameter estimation in longitudinal studies with outcome-dependent follow-up.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Ibrahim JG; Gelber R; Lipshultz S
    Biometrics; 2002 Sep; 58(3):621-30. PubMed ID: 12229997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.