These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10877376)

  • 1. Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: test-retest variability.
    Spry PG; Henson DB; Sparrow JM; North RV
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Jun; 9(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 10877376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisampling suprathreshold perimetry: a comparison with conventional suprathreshold and full-threshold strategies by computer simulation.
    Artes PH; Henson DB; Harper R; McLeod D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Jun; 44(6):2582-7. PubMed ID: 12766060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 9686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Aug; 76(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9716329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does saving time using FASTPAC or suprathreshold testing reduce quality of visual fields?
    Mills RP; Barnebey HS; Migliazzo CV; Li Y
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Sep; 101(9):1596-603. PubMed ID: 8090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Is the gain in examination time offset by any loss of information?
    Nordmann JP; Denis P; Nguer Y; Mouton-Chopin D; Saraux H
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1994; 4(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 7950333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.
    O'Brien C; Poinoosawmy D; Wu J; Hitchings R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 78(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7918261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Aoki Y; Takahashi G; Kitahara K
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17415692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the new perimetric GATE strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies.
    Schiefer U; Pascual JP; Edmunds B; Feudner E; Hoffmann EM; Johnson CA; Lagrèze WA; Pfeiffer N; Sample PA; Staubach F; Weleber RG; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Paetzold J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):488-94. PubMed ID: 19060285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.
    Kosoko O; Sommer A; Auer C
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 104(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 3954641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.
    Heijl A; Patella VM; Chong LX; Iwase A; Leung CK; Tuulonen A; Lee GC; Callan T; Bengtsson B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 198():154-165. PubMed ID: 30336129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Technologies for Glaucoma Case-Finding in a Community Setting.
    Dabasia PL; Fidalgo BR; Edgar DF; Garway-Heath DF; Lawrenson JG
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Dec; 122(12):2407-15. PubMed ID: 26411836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability in glaucomatous visual fields: implications for shared care schemes.
    Henson DB; Spry PG; Spencer IC; Sparrow JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Mar; 18(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 9692031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Trope GE
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Jun; 100(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 8510911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Iester M; Capris P; Altieri M; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Int Ophthalmol; 1999; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Home Monitoring Allow Earlier Detection of Rapid Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma?
    Anderson AJ; Bedggood PA; George Kong YX; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Dec; 124(12):1735-1742. PubMed ID: 28764889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.