These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10877445)

  • 21. Communicating emotion: linking affective prosody and word meaning.
    Nygaard LC; Queen JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1017-30. PubMed ID: 18665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Listener Perceptions of Women With Voice Disorders: Vocal Stereotyping and Negative Personality Attribution.
    Shimrock S; Ferrand C
    J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):934.e1-934.e6. PubMed ID: 32299637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation.
    Beddor PS; Krakow RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2868-87. PubMed ID: 10573902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of listener training on the perceptual assessment of hypernasality.
    Oliveira AC; Scarmagnani RH; Fukushiro AP; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 27191877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of hypernasality in vowels using voice low tone to high tone ratio.
    Lee GS; Wang CP; Fu S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Jan; 46(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 19115797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic analysis of voice in children with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Villafuerte-Gonzalez R; Valadez-Jimenez VM; Hernandez-Lopez X; Ysunza PA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1073-6. PubMed ID: 25953453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Listeners' perceptions of speech and language disorders.
    Allard ER; Williams DF
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(2):108-23. PubMed ID: 17586521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A lecturer's voice quality and its effect on memory, listening effort, and perception in a VR environment.
    Schiller IS; Breuer C; Aspöck L; Ehret J; Bönsch A; Kuhlen TW; Fels J; Schlittmeier SJ
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12407. PubMed ID: 38811832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Voice perturbations of children with perceived nasality and hoarseness.
    Zajac DJ; Linville RN
    Cleft Palate J; 1989 Jul; 26(3):226-31; discussion 231-2. PubMed ID: 2758675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Some difference limens for the perception of breathiness.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):416-23. PubMed ID: 16875237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality compared to HONC measures: the role of experience.
    Laczi E; Sussman JE; Stathopoulos ET; Huber J
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Mar; 42(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15748113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale.
    Yamaguchi H; Shrivastav R; Andrews ML; Niimi S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 12771466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3014-21. PubMed ID: 12509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scaling of voice pleasantness and acceptability in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 16102664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-cleft causes of velopharyngeal dysfunction: implications for treatment.
    Kummer AW; Marshall JL; Wilson MM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 79(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 25604261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hypernasality and velopharyngeal impairment.
    Warren DW; Dalston RM; Mayo R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul; 31(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 7918520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.