149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10877704)
1. Toxicology. Just how bad is dioxin?
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Jun; 288(5473):1941-4. PubMed ID: 10877704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consultation on assessment of the health risk of dioxins; re-evaluation of the tolerable daily intake (TDI): executive summary.
Food Addit Contam; 2000 Apr; 17(4):223-40. PubMed ID: 10912238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dioxin draft sparks controversy.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 May; 288(5470):1313-4. PubMed ID: 10847834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Toxicology. Panel backs EPA dioxin assessment.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5494):1071. PubMed ID: 11184998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dioxin report faces scientific gauntlet.
Stone R
Science; 1994 Sep; 265(5179):1650. PubMed ID: 8085150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science policy choices and the estimation of cancer risk associated with exposure to TCDD.
Gough M
Risk Anal; 1988 Sep; 8(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 2849149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Basis for a proposed reference dose (RfD) for dioxin of 1-10 pg/kg-day: a weight of evidence evaluation of the human and animal studies.
Greene JF; Hays S; Paustenbach D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(2):115-59. PubMed ID: 12554432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk assessment of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in food--comments by the German Federal Environmental Agency.
Gies A; Neumeier G; Rappolder M; Konietzka R
Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(9):S344-9. PubMed ID: 17223171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dioxin: are we safer now than before?
Finkel AM
Risk Anal; 1988 Jun; 8(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 3413307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Persistent chlorinated organic compounds and their relevance to environmental medicine].
Triebig G; Hoffmann J; Zimmer H
Internist (Berl); 2002 Jul; 43(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 12219686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. EPA dioxin reassessment.
Bradfield CA; Gallo MA; Gasiewicz TA; Greenberg RS; Greenlee WF; Margolick J; Mattison DR; Munson P; Neal RA; Okey AB
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5191):1628-9. PubMed ID: 7992038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Dioxin; standards recommended by the World Health Organization].
Theelen RM; Knaap AG; Sangster B
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 May; 135(20):875-7. PubMed ID: 2046786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental dioxins and endometriosis.
Rier S; Foster WG
Toxicol Sci; 2002 Dec; 70(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 12441361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lessons for living in a chemical world.
Selikoff IJ
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1984 Dec; 33(6):682-95. PubMed ID: 6394072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Toxicokinetics.
van Birgelen AP; van den Berg M
Food Addit Contam; 2000 Apr; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 10912241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dioxin.
Kloeppel J
J Kans Med Soc; 1983 Oct; 84(10):529, 43. PubMed ID: 6644150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Evaluation (2001) of the EPA dioxin reassessment.
Paustenbach DJ;
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Oct; 36(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12460755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significant shortcomings of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's latest draft risk characterization for dioxin-like compounds.
Starr TB
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Nov; 64(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 11606796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dioxin: dangerous as expected.
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Aug; 102(8):622. PubMed ID: 7895698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [What is the understanding of the scientific basis and the regulatory toxicology associated with the term "not appreciable " in the risk evaluation of carcinogens].
Dieter HH; Konietzka R; Neumann HG
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1084-5. PubMed ID: 17676413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
