These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10878272)

  • 1. Probability summation for multiple patches of luminance modulation.
    Meese TS; Williams CB
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(16):2101-13. PubMed ID: 10878272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energy model for contrast detection: spatial-frequency and orientation selectivity in grating summation.
    Manahilov V; Simpson WA
    Vision Res; 2001 May; 41(12):1547-60. PubMed ID: 11343721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty: evidence for a noisy energy model.
    Meese TS; Summers RJ
    J Vis; 2012 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 23077206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast integration over area is extensive: a three-stage model of spatial summation.
    Baker DH; Meese TS
    J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22178702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.
    Meese TS; Summers RJ
    J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):7.1-16. PubMed ID: 19757916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli.
    Pan F; Swanson WH
    J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1159-71. PubMed ID: 17209726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial summation of broadband contrast.
    Richard B; Hansen BC; Johnson AP; Shafto P
    J Vis; 2019 May; 19(5):16. PubMed ID: 31100132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A common contrast pooling rule for suppression within and between the eyes.
    Meese TS; Challinor KL; Summers RJ
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(4):585-601. PubMed ID: 18764960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation and gain pool summation: alternative models and masking data.
    Meese TS; Holmes DJ
    Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(9):1113-25. PubMed ID: 11997050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin.
    Meese TS; Hess RF
    J Vis; 2004 Oct; 4(10):843-59. PubMed ID: 15595890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grating and plaid masks indicate linear summation in a contrast gain pool.
    Holmes DJ; Meese TS
    J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):1080-9. PubMed ID: 15669912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatially extensive summation of contrast energy is revealed by contrast detection of micro-pattern textures.
    Meese TS
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):14. PubMed ID: 20884589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remote facilitation in the Fourier domain.
    Meese TS; Holmes DJ; Challinor KL
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(8):1112-9. PubMed ID: 17189647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The binocular combination of chromatic contrast.
    Simmons DR
    Perception; 2005; 34(8):1035-42. PubMed ID: 16178160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summation characteristics of the detection of compound gratings.
    Plainis S; Parry NR; Panorgias A; Sapountzis P; Murray IJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(16):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19460399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions of chromaticity and luminance in edge identification depend on chromaticity.
    Smith VC; Pokorny J
    Vis Neurosci; 2004; 21(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 15518217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal aspects of orientation pooling using visual noise stimuli.
    Anderson ND; Murphy KM; Jones DG
    J Vis; 2007 Jan; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 17461677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A psychophysical correlate of contrast dependent changes in receptive field properties.
    Mareschal I; Andrew Henrie J; Shapley RM
    Vision Res; 2002 Jul; 42(15):1879-87. PubMed ID: 12128018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison at a distance.
    Danilova MV; Mollon JD
    Perception; 2003; 32(4):395-414. PubMed ID: 12785480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring and modelling the spatial contrast sensitivity of the chicken (Gallus g. domesticus).
    Jarvis JR; Abeyesinghe SM; McMahon CE; Wathes CM
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1448-54. PubMed ID: 19272401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.