These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Short communication: Practical aspects for the evaluation of skin doses in interventional cardiology using a new slow film. Guibelalde E; Vano E; Gonzalez L; Prieto C; Fernandez JM; Ten JI Br J Radiol; 2003 May; 76(905):332-6. PubMed ID: 12763949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the radiation dose in a cardiac IVR X-ray system. Inaba Y; Chida K; Shirotori K; Shimura H; Yanagawa I; Zuguchi M; Takahashi S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21081517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures. Padovani R; Bernardi G; Malisan MR; Vañó E; Morocutti G; Fioretti PM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):189-92. PubMed ID: 11487833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation injury to skin following a cardiac interventional procedure. Poletti JL Australas Radiol; 1997 Feb; 41(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 9125082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. DOSE MEASUREMENT USING GAFCHROMIC FILM FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES. Saeed MK Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(1):109-112. PubMed ID: 27056138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice of phantom material and test protocols to determine radiation exposure rates for fluoroscopy. Anderson JA; Wang J; Clarke GD Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1033-42. PubMed ID: 10903693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A tracking system to calculate patient skin dose in real-time during neurointerventional procedures using a biplane x-ray imaging system. Rana VK; Rudin S; Bednarek DR Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5131. PubMed ID: 27587043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin radiation injuries in patients following repeated coronary angioplasty procedures. Vano E; Goicolea J; Galvan C; Gonzalez L; Meiggs L; Ten JI; Macaya C Br J Radiol; 2001 Nov; 74(887):1023-31. PubMed ID: 11709468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Larrazet F; Dibie A; Philippe F; Palau R; Klausz R; Laborde F Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):473-7. PubMed ID: 12857707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of a MOSkin detector for in vivo skin dose measurements during interventional radiology procedures. Safari MJ; Wong JH; Ng KH; Jong WL; Cutajar DL; Rosenfeld AB Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2550-8. PubMed ID: 25979047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study. Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of measured and estimated maximum skin doses during CT fluoroscopy lung biopsies. Zanca F; Jacobs A; Crijns W; De Wever W Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073901. PubMed ID: 24989420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increases in patient doses need to be avoided when upgrading interventional cardiology systems to flat detectors. Prieto C; Vano E; Fernández JM; Martínez D; Sánchez R Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):83-5. PubMed ID: 21733865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation doses in a newly founded Interventional Cardiology department. Tsapaki V; Christou A; Nikolaou N; Spanodimos S; Chinofoti I; Poulianitou A; Patsilinakos S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):72-4. PubMed ID: 21725076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]