191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10879254)
1. Detection of false positives by incorporation of a confirmatory blocking test into a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific for adenovirus antigen.
Kirnpal-Kaur BS; Yap KL; Tan SC
Malays J Pathol; 1997 Dec; 19(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 10879254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory approaches to the diagnosis of adenovirus infection depending on clinical manifestations.
Terletskaia-Ladwig E; Leinmüller M; Schneider F; Meier S; Enders M
Infection; 2007 Dec; 35(6):438-43. PubMed ID: 17926002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection and characterization of group C rotavirus in Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1997-2003.
Castello AA; Argüelles MH; Rota RP; Humphrey CD; Olthoff A; Gentsch JR; Glass RI; Glikmann G; Jiang B
J Med Virol; 2009 Jun; 81(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19382268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of nonspecific reactions in laboratory rodent specimens tested by Rotazyme rotavirus ELISA.
Jure MN; Morse SS; Stark DM
Lab Anim Sci; 1988 Jun; 38(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 2842540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of enzyme immunoassay, counterimmunoelectrophoresis and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the diagnosis of rotaviruses].
Gómez JA; Bercovich JA; Grinstein S
Rev Argent Microbiol; 1985; 17(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 2829273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Dako IDEIA norovirus EIA assay for detection of norovirus using faecal specimens from Australian gastroenteritis outbreaks.
Dimitriadis A; Bruggink LD; Marshall JA
Pathology; 2006 Apr; 38(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 16581657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement of the specificity of enzyme immunoassays for the detection of rotavirus and adenovirus in fecal specimens.
Rabenau H; Knoll B; Allwinn R; Doerr HW; Weber B
Intervirology; 1998; 41(2-3):55-62. PubMed ID: 9820838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory diagnosis of rotavirus infection in diarrhoeal patients by immunoenzymatic and latex-agglutination assays.
Ruggeri FM; Marziano ML; Salvatori E; Bisicchia R; Scardellato U; Scagnelli M; Modolo ML; Santini G; Donelli G
Microbiologica; 1992 Jul; 15(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 1323741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, electron microscopy, and reversed passive haemagglutination for detection of human rotavirus in stool specimens.
Tsuchie H; Shimase K; Tamura I; Kurimura O; Kaneto E; Katsumoto T; Ito M; Kurimura T
Biken J; 1983 Jun; 26(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 6318724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid diagnosis of adult diarrhea rotavirus (ADRV): detection of viral antigens in faecal samples using staphylococcal co-agglutination test.
Zhang YH; Zhou DN; Wang CA; Hung T
Acta Virol; 1989 Jan; 33(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2565672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of latex agglutination test with an ELISA to diagnose rotavirus-associated diarrhoea in infants and young children.
Amer AA; el-Mougi M; Hughes J; el-Tayyeb S; el-Abhar A; el-Shafie A
J Diarrhoeal Dis Res; 1990 Sep; 8(3):87-9. PubMed ID: 2243180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of group- and subgroup-specific antigens of bovine rotaviruses in Bangladesh.
Alam MM; Ahmed MU; Chowdhury NS; Urasawa S
J Diarrhoeal Dis Res; 1999 Jun; 17(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 10897891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing electron microscopy and a competitive blocking ELISA in the detection of rotaviruses in porcine faeces.
Rodák L; Smítalová R; Šmíd B; Nevoránková Z; Valíček L; Pšikal I
Vet J; 2011 Feb; 187(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 20036588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with electron microscopy, fluorescent antibody, and virus isolation for the detection of bovine and porcine rotavirus.
Benfield DA; Stotz IJ; Nelson EA; Groon KS
Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):1998-2002. PubMed ID: 6093642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosing rotavirus A associated IID: Using ELISA to identify a cut-off for real time RT-PCR.
Phillips G; Lopman B; Tam CC; Iturriza-Gomara M; Brown D; Gray J
J Clin Virol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):242-5. PubMed ID: 19179107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of adenovirus and rotavirus antigens by an immuno-gold lateral flow test and ultrasound-enhanced latex agglutination assay.
Sobanski MA; Stephens J; Biagini GA; Coakley WT
J Med Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 50(2):203. PubMed ID: 11211231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Three kinds of viruses isolated from diarrhea patients of infants and preschool children in Fuzhou city].
Gao JM; Wang T; Chen JL; Chen JY; Lin Y; Cai Z
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2004 May; 25(5):456-7. PubMed ID: 15231185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Sensitivity and specificity of the VIKIA Rota-Adeno immuno-chromatographic test (bioMérieux) and the ELISA IDEIA Rotavirus kit (Dako) compared to genotyping].
de Rougemont A; Kaplon J; Billaud G; Lina B; Pinchinat S; Derrough T; Caulin E; Pothier P; Floret D
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2009 Feb; 57(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 18838230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A sensitive adenovirus immunoassay as a model for using nanoparticle label technology in virus diagnostics.
Valanne A; Huopalahti S; Soukka T; Vainionpää R; Lövgren T; Härmä H
J Clin Virol; 2005 Jul; 33(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 15911443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of diagnostic methods in rotavirus infection: immunofluorescence, ELISA and the latex agglutination test].
Arista S; Giovannelli L; Balsano M; Di Stefano R
Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Sep; 20(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 6099580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
