BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10880779)

  • 1. An approach to identifying incident breast cancer cases using Medicare claims data.
    Freeman JL; Zhang D; Freeman DH; Goodwin JS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):605-14. PubMed ID: 10880779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
    Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Medicare hospital and physician data to assess breast cancer incidence.
    Warren JL; Feuer E; Potosky AL; Riley GF; Lynch CF
    Med Care; 1999 May; 37(5):445-56. PubMed ID: 10335747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.
    Gold HT; Do HT
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Oct; 42(5):2056-69. PubMed ID: 17850533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and completeness of Medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer.
    Du X; Freeman JL; Warren JL; Nattinger AB; Zhang D; Goodwin JS
    Med Care; 2000 Jul; 38(7):719-27. PubMed ID: 10901355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limited validity of diagnosis codes in Medicare claims for identifying cancer metastases and inferring stage.
    Chawla N; Yabroff KR; Mariotto A; McNeel TS; Schrag D; Warren JL
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):666-72, 672.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25066409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finding incident breast cancer cases through US claims data and a state cancer registry.
    Wang PS; Walker AM; Tsuang MT; Orav EJ; Levin R; Avorn J
    Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Apr; 12(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 11405331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing breast cancer case identification using HMO computerized diagnostic data and SEER data.
    Rolnick SJ; Hart G; Barton MB; Herrinton L; Flores SK; Paulsen KJ; Husson G; Harris EL; Geiger AM; Elmore JG; Fletcher SW
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 15124502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sensitivity of Medicare data for identifying incident cases of invasive melanoma (United States).
    Barzilai DA; Koroukian SM; Neuhauser D; Cooper KD; Rimm AA; Cooper GS
    Cancer Causes Control; 2004 Mar; 15(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 15017130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of coding algorithms to identify patients with incident lung cancer in United States healthcare claims data.
    Beyrer J; Nelson DR; Sheffield KM; Huang YJ; Ellington T; Hincapie AL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1465-1479. PubMed ID: 33012044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concordance between administrative claims and registry data for identifying metastasis to the bone: an exploratory analysis in prostate cancer.
    Onukwugha E; Yong C; Hussain A; Seal B; Mullins CD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():1. PubMed ID: 24383436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies for improving comorbidity measures based on Medicare and Medicaid claims data.
    Wang PS; Walker A; Tsuang M; Orav EJ; Levin R; Avorn J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 10880775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ability of Medicaid claims data to identify incident cases of breast cancer in the Ohio Medicaid population.
    Koroukian SM; Cooper GS; Rimm AA
    Health Serv Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):947-60. PubMed ID: 12822920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The utility of Medicare claims data for measuring cancer stage.
    Cooper GS; Yuan Z; Stange KC; Amini SB; Dennis LK; Rimm AA
    Med Care; 1999 Jul; 37(7):706-11. PubMed ID: 10424641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of administrative claims to identify incident cases of lung cancer: a comparison of 3 health plans.
    Ramsey SD; Scoggins JF; Blough DK; McDermott CL; Reyes CM
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2009 Oct; 15(8):659-68. PubMed ID: 19803555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a Medicare Claims-based Algorithm for Identifying Breast Cancers Detected at Screening Mammography.
    Fenton JJ; Onega T; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Henderson L; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA
    Med Care; 2016 Mar; 54(3):e15-22. PubMed ID: 23929404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Medicare claims data for estimation of cancer incidence and resection rates among elderly Americans.
    Whittle J; Steinberg EP; Anderson GF; Herbert R
    Med Care; 1991 Dec; 29(12):1226-36. PubMed ID: 1745080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of Medicare data to identify incident breast cancer cases.
    Warren JL; Riley GF; McBean AM; Hakim R
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1996; 18(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 10165033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of SEER-Medicare data for measuring cancer surgery.
    Cooper GS; Virnig B; Klabunde CN; Schussler N; Freeman J; Warren JL
    Med Care; 2002 Aug; 40(8 Suppl):IV-43-8. PubMed ID: 12187167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sensitivity of Medicare claims data for case ascertainment of six common cancers.
    Cooper GS; Yuan Z; Stange KC; Dennis LK; Amini SB; Rimm AA
    Med Care; 1999 May; 37(5):436-44. PubMed ID: 10335746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.