These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10881460)
1. Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system. Bryant AR; Tinley P; Singer KP J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2000 Jun; 90(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 10881460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST2 system. Maetzler M; Bochdansky T; Abboud RJ Gait Posture; 2010 Jul; 32(3):391-4. PubMed ID: 20663670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the dynamic pedobarograph and EMED systems for measuring dynamic foot pressures. Quaney B; Meyer K; Cornwall MW; McPoil TG Foot Ankle Int; 1995 Sep; 16(9):562-6. PubMed ID: 8563925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The EMED System of foot pressure analysis. Graf PM Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1993 Jul; 10(3):445-54. PubMed ID: 8364847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the reliability of plantar pressure measurements using the two-step and midgait methods of data collection. Bryant A; Singer K; Tinley P Foot Ankle Int; 1999 Oct; 20(10):646-50. PubMed ID: 10540996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic plantar pressure analysis. Comparing common insole materials. Sanfilippo PB; Stess RM; Moss KM J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 82(10):507-13. PubMed ID: 1474483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normal Values of Pressures and Foot Areas Measured in the Static Condition. Lalande X; Vie B; Weber JP; Jammes Y J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2016 Jul; 106(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 27489967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Static and dynamic plantar pressure measurements in adolescents]. Tuna H; Yildiz M; Celtik C; Kokino S Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 15347920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed ST4 system. Putti AB; Arnold GP; Cochrane LA; Abboud RJ Gait Posture; 2008 Apr; 27(3):501-5. PubMed ID: 17702582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Test-retest reliability and descriptive statistics of geometric measurements based on plantar pressure measurements in a healthy population during gait. Akins JS; Keenan KA; Sell TC; Abt JP; Lephart SM Gait Posture; 2012 Jan; 35(1):167-9. PubMed ID: 21917456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The F-SCAN system of foot pressure analysis. Young CR Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1993 Jul; 10(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 8364848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can the Foot Posture Index or their individual criteria predict dynamic plantar pressures? Sánchez-Rodríguez R; Martínez-Nova A; Escamilla-Martínez E; Pedrera-Zamorano JD Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 22727718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal pressures and reliability of the Gaitview® system in healthy adults. Kim YT; Lee JS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 22282873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. van der Leeden M; Dekker JH; Siemonsma PC; Lek-Westerhof SS; Steultjens MP Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Oct; 25(10):739-44. PubMed ID: 15566706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Dupuis L; Cornwell M J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1999 Oct; 89(10):495-501. PubMed ID: 10546420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compartment pressure in the foot. Analysis of normal values and measurement technique. Dayton P; Goldman FD; Barton E J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1990 Oct; 80(10):521-5. PubMed ID: 2269919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]