These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10881559)

  • 1. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jul; 29(4):710-27. PubMed ID: 12924869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?
    Alloy LB; Abramson LY
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):441-85. PubMed ID: 528910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causal judgment from contingency information: a systematic test of the pCI rule.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 15285120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two pathways to causal control: use and availability of information in the environment in people with and without signs of depression.
    Byrom NC; Msetfi RM; Murphy RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():1-12. PubMed ID: 25703605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recency and primacy in causal judgments: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction.
    Glautier S
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 18927027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recursive retrospective revaluation of causal judgments.
    Macho S; Burkart J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1171-86. PubMed ID: 12450340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [On the validity of applying associative learning model to the acquisition process of human contingency judgment].
    Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1999 Dec; 70(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10756589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Causal judgments about relations between multilevel variables.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):499-513. PubMed ID: 11294446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primacy in causal strength judgments: the effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships.
    Dennis MJ; Ahn WK
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 11277458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgments of causal efficacy under constant and changing interevent contingencies.
    Katagiri M; Kao SF; Simon AM; Castro L; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 17029817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasoning strategies and prior knowledge effects in contingency learning.
    Béghin G; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Aug; 50(6):1269-1283. PubMed ID: 35484431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The psychophysics of contingency assessment.
    Allan LG; Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Siegel S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):226-43. PubMed ID: 18473655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.