These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10881604)

  • 1. Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA; Johnson JL; Jones FL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 10881604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A positive patterning advantage with complex but not simple patterning: a cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2118-34. PubMed ID: 23506406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative patterning and biconditional discriminations in human causal reasoning: a second look.
    Whitlow JW
    Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23505955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inattentional blindness for negative relationships in human causal learning.
    Maldonado A; Jiménez G; Herrera A; Perales JC; Catena A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):457-70. PubMed ID: 16627349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing positive and negative patterning in human learning.
    Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; Harris JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2316-33. PubMed ID: 22026453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning in a changing environment.
    Speekenbrink M; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):266-98. PubMed ID: 20438252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning.
    Whitlow JW
    Learn Behav; 2010 May; 38(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 20400734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.
    Beckers T; De Houwer J; Pineño O; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 15755242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential reward outcome learning in adult humans.
    Easton A
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 154(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 15302122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.