These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10881617)

  • 1. Global-local orientation congruency effects in visual search.
    Kunde W; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 10881617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19803647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
    Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fate of global precedence with age.
    Bruyer R; Scailquin JC
    Exp Aging Res; 2000; 26(4):285-314. PubMed ID: 11091937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.
    Busey T; Palmer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):790-810. PubMed ID: 18665726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Featural guidance in conjunction search: the contrast between orientation and color.
    Anderson GM; Heinke D; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1108-27. PubMed ID: 20718568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning.
    Howard JH; Howard DV; Japikse KC; Eden GF
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1131-44. PubMed ID: 16313930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):425-34. PubMed ID: 2958591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grouping local orientation and direction signals to extract spatial contours: empirical tests of "association field" models of contour integration.
    Ledgeway T; Hess RF; Geisler WS
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2511-22. PubMed ID: 15890381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.