These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10882244)

  • 1. Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study.
    Sivaramakrishna R; Obuchowski NA; Chilcote WA; Cardenosa G; Powell KA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jul; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10882244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved interpretation of digitized mammography with wavelet processing: a localization response operating characteristic study.
    Kallergi M; Heine JJ; Berman CG; Hersh MR; Romilly AP; Clark RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 14975972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Hemminger BM; Yaffe MJ; Aylward SR; Maidment AD; Johnston RE; Williams MB; Niklason LT; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Kopans DB; Brown ME; Pizer SM
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1479-91. PubMed ID: 10992035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology.
    Betal D; Roberts N; Whitehouse GH
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):903-17. PubMed ID: 9486066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive mammographic image enhancement using first derivative and local statistics.
    Kim JK; Park JM; Song KS; Park HW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9368105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications.
    Kim HS; Han BK; Choo KS; Jeon YH; Kim JH; Choe YH
    Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16374078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast calcifications: analysis of imaging properties.
    Olson SL; Fam BW; Winter PF; Scholz FJ; Lee AK; Gordon SE
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 3174980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammography.
    Moradmand H; Setayeshi S; Karimian AR; Sirous M; Akbari ME
    Iran J Cancer Prev; 2012; 5(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25628822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Zeng D; Muller K; Aylward SR; Park S; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Walsh R; Baker J; Gimenez EI; Freimanis R
    Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):585-95. PubMed ID: 15866131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and wavelet-enhanced monitor-displayed mammograms: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Kallergi M; Clarke LP; Qian W; Gavrielides M; Venugopal P; Berman CG; Holman-Ferris SD; Miller MS; Clark RA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 8796676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D; Soo MS; Walsh R; Pisano E; Kuzmiak CM; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26. PubMed ID: 17070449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
    Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques.
    Hemminger BM; Zong S; Muller KE; Coffey CS; DeLuca MC; Johnston RE; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Sep; 8(9):845-55. PubMed ID: 11724039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms.
    Fam BW; Olson SL; Winter PF; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 3174981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.