These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10883612)
1. New microsurgical breast reconstruction using free paraumbilical perforator adiposal flaps. Koshima I; Inagawa K; Yamamoto M; Moriguchi T Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jul; 106(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 10883612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Muscle sparing-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: a comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Takeishi M; Fujimoto M; Ishida K; Makino Y Microsurgery; 2008; 28(8):650-5. PubMed ID: 18844226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Chevray PM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Lee KT; Mun GH Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microvascular augmentation of the blood supply of the contralateral side of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Pennington DG; Nettle WJ; Lam P Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Aug; 31(2):123-6; discussion 126-7. PubMed ID: 8215126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon. Damen TH; Morritt AN; Zhong T; Ahmad J; Hofer SO J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23642795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Pedicled versus free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction]. Galla TJ; Lukas B; Feller AM Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1999 Mar; 31(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 10337558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Preoperative CT angiography for planning free perforator flaps in breast reconstruction]. Kuekrek H; Müller D; Paepke S; Dobritz M; Machens HG; Giunta RE Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2011 Apr; 43(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 21509699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Myosonographic evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle function after DIEP flap breast reconstruction]. Kässmann C; Peek A; Luxenhofer F; Scheufler O; Exner K Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2002 Nov; 34(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 12601605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modified free paraumbilical perforator flap: the next logical step in breast reconstruction. Schoeller T; Bauer T; Gurunluoglu R; Hussl H; Otto-Schoeller A; Piza-Katzer H; Wechselberger G Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1093-8; discussion 1099-1101. PubMed ID: 12621179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Free rectus abdominis muscle perforating artery flaps for reconstruction of the head and neck defects]. Koshima I; Handa T; Satoh Y; Akisada K; Orita Y; Yamamoto H Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1995 Jan; 98(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7897566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients. Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates. Ng RL; Youssef A; Kronowitz SJ; Lipa JE; Potochny J; Reece GP Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):374-84; discussion 385-8. PubMed ID: 15277802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction. Andrades P; Fix RJ; Danilla S; Howell RE; Campbell WJ; De la Torre J; Vasconez LO Ann Plast Surg; 2008 May; 60(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 18434832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paraumbilical perforator flap without deep inferior epigastric vessels. Koshima I; Inagawa K; Urushibara K; Moriguchi T Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(4):1052-7. PubMed ID: 9734423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of internal mammary vessel perforator as a recipient vessel for free TRAM breast reconstruction. Park MC; Lee JH; Chung J; Lee SH Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Feb; 50(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 12567048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Chang DW; Wang B; Robb GL; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]