These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects. Hosking SG; Crassini B J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating episodic memories and prior knowledge at multiple levels of abstraction. Hemmer P; Steyvers M Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 19145014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verbal predicates foster conscious recollection but not familiarity of a task-irrelevant perceptual feature--an ERP study. Ecker UK; Arend AM; Bergström K; Zimmer HD Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):679-89. PubMed ID: 19443243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infant recognition of the invariant form of objects. Ruff HA Child Dev; 1978 Jun; 49(2):293-306. PubMed ID: 679774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Message valence, familiarity, sex, and personality effects on the perceptual distortion of height. Hensley WE; Angoli M J Psychol; 1980 Mar; 104(2d Half):149-56. PubMed ID: 7365700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects. Bülthoff I; Newell FN Prog Brain Res; 2006; 154():315-25. PubMed ID: 17010720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of familiar size on judgments of relative size and distance. Predebon J Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1211-4. PubMed ID: 492892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of object relative size on priming and explicit memory. Uttl B; Graf P; Siegenthaler AL PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3109. PubMed ID: 18769670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Observing and engaging in purposeful actions with objects influences estimates of their size. Wesp R; Cichello P; Gracia EB; Davis K Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1261-7. PubMed ID: 15813192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Taking a hands-on approach: apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size. Linkenauger SA; Witt JK; Proffitt DR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1432-41. PubMed ID: 21728460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of object size on baseline identification, priming, and explicit memory. Uttl B; Graf P; Siegenthaler AL Scand J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 48(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 17669218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer movement and size constancy. Combe E; Wexler M Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20483845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outlined objects in a Mach pattern create illusions: further evidence of a frequency code for size. Jaeger T; Long S; Lang J Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):165-80. PubMed ID: 18986044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the whole really more than the sum of its parts? Estimates of average size and orientation are susceptible to object substitution masking. Jacoby O; Kamke MR; Mattingley JB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):233-44. PubMed ID: 22642216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]