These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10884008)

  • 1. The role of perceptual load in negative priming.
    Lavie N; Fox E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Jun; 26(3):1038-52. PubMed ID: 10884008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Nowak EJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):817-28. PubMed ID: 12956588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention.
    Maylor EA; Lavie N
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Dec; 13(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 9883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.
    Wilson DE; Muroi M; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):319-35. PubMed ID: 21299322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism.
    Guy S; Buckolz E; Pratt J
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 14959501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of perceptual load in action affordance by ignored objects.
    Murphy S; van Velzen J; de Fockert JW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1122-7. PubMed ID: 22806449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load.
    Gupta R; Hur YJ; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2016 Apr; 16(3):328-37. PubMed ID: 26479771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.
    Benoni H; Tsal Y
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.
    Lavie N; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 11595091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology.
    Olivers CN; Hickey C
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1362-71. PubMed ID: 19962396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli.
    Jacoby O; Hall SE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22465299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
    Lavie N; Ro T; Russell C
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12930485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practice in visual search produces decreased capacity demands but increased distraction.
    Wilson DE; MacLeod CM; Muroi M
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Aug; 70(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 18717397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention.
    Lavie N; de Fockert JW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 12713239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual grouping and visual selective attention.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Aug; 60(6):1004-21. PubMed ID: 9718959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Where has all the inhibition gone? Insights from electrophysiological measures into negative priming without probe distractors.
    Groh-Bordin C; Frings C
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 19619926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor effects during processing of words under load.
    Brand-D'Abrescia M; Lavie N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1153-7. PubMed ID: 18229489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
    Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased perceptual and conceptual processing difficulty makes the immeasurable measurable: negative priming in the absence of probe distractors.
    Frings C; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 21077720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.