These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10884212)

  • 1. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component.
    Watanabe Y; Shiba N; Matsuo S; Higuchi F; Tagawa Y; Inoue A
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 10884212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
    Wik TS
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of femoral neck stress in relation to pelvic width.
    Schwarzkopf R; Dong NN; Fetto JF
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 22196384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
    Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hip resurfacing increases bone strains associated with short-term femoral neck fracture.
    Long JP; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Oct; 27(10):1319-25. PubMed ID: 19338031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing - a finite element simulation.
    Tai CL; Chen YC; Hsieh PH
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Aug; 15():262. PubMed ID: 25095740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Shimmin A; Beaulé PE; Campbell P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):637-54. PubMed ID: 18310716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: the influence of the prosthesis size and positioning on the remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck.
    Dickinson AS; Taylor AC; Browne M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 20408488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing.
    Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Papini M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041002. PubMed ID: 19275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
    Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
    Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biomechanical characteristics of hip prosthesis in hip arthroplasty treating elderly patients with Evans I-III intertrochanteric fracture of femur].
    Liu WG; Liu SH; Yin QF; Xiao SP; Wang SJ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2013 Feb; 35(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 23472858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the fixation region of a press-fit hip endoprosthesis on the stress-strain state of the "bone-implant" system.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Goethel MF; Loskutov A
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 May; 84():195-204. PubMed ID: 28390287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 2: The influence of prosthesis stem design on remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck.
    Dickinson AS; Taylor AC; Jeffers JR; Browne M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(7):841-51. PubMed ID: 20839652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthesis design and stress profile after hip resurfacing: a finite element analysis.
    Heijink A; Zobitz ME; Nuyts R; Morrey BF; An KN
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2008 Dec; 16(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 19126900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical optimization of subject-specific implant positioning for femoral head resurfacing to reduce fracture risk.
    Miles B; Kolos E; Appleyard R; Theodore W; Zheng K; Li Q; Ruys AJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):668-74. PubMed ID: 27098752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Day JS; Kurtz SM; Field RE; Manley MT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18823747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.