These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. HLODs remain powerful tools for detection of linkage in the presence of genetic heterogeneity. Hodge SE; Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 11791217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid multipoint linkage analysis of recessive traits in nuclear families, including homozygosity mapping. Kruglyak L; Daly MJ; Lander ES Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Feb; 56(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 7847388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linkage analysis of a complex pedigree with severe bipolar disorder, using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Garner C; McInnes LA; Service SK; Spesny M; Fournier E; Leon P; Freimer NB Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Apr; 68(4):1061-4. PubMed ID: 11222106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test does not replace the transmission/disequilibrium test. Horvath S; Windemuth C; Knapp M Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Aug; 67(2):531-4. PubMed ID: 10889051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pseudoautosomal linkage of Hodgkin disease. Whittemore AS; Shih MC Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Aug; 67(2):535-7. PubMed ID: 10889053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Distribution of lod scores in oligogenic linkage analysis. Williams JT; North KE; Martin LJ; Comuzzie AG; Göring HH; Blangero J Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S805-10. PubMed ID: 11793782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A variance component approach to dichotomous trait linkage analysis using a threshold model. Duggirala R; Williams JT; Williams-Blangero S; Blangero J Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 9433612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance thresholds for quantitative trait locus mapping under selective genotyping. Manichaikul A; Palmer AA; Sen S; Broman KW Genetics; 2007 Nov; 177(3):1963-6. PubMed ID: 17720902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lod scores for gene mapping in the presence of marker map uncertainty. Stringham HM; Boehnke M Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11443732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Down-weighting of multiple affected sib pairs leads to biased likelihood-ratio tests, under the assumption of no linkage. Greenwood CM; Bull SB Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1248-52. PubMed ID: 10090918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regression models for linkage heterogeneity applied to familial prostate cancer. Schaid DJ; McDonnell SK; Thibodeau SN Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1189-96. PubMed ID: 11309684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Ising model in physics and statistical genetics. Majewski J; Li H; Ott J Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Oct; 69(4):853-62. PubMed ID: 11517425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters. Göring HH; Terwilliger JD Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]