These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10884360)

  • 21. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exact multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in pedigrees by variance components.
    Pratt SC; Daly MJ; Kruglyak L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1153-7. PubMed ID: 10712227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The performance of MIM in comparison with MAPMAKER/SIBS to detect QTLs.
    Shugart YY; Goldgar DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 9433597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A likelihood approach for quantitative-trait-locus mapping with selected pedigrees.
    Wang K
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 16011693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Model-free linkage analysis with covariates confirms linkage of prostate cancer to chromosomes 1 and 4.
    Goddard KA; Witte JS; Suarez BK; Catalona WJ; Olson JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1197-206. PubMed ID: 11309685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Power comparison of parametric and nonparametric linkage tests in small pedigrees.
    Sham PC; Lin MW; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1661-8. PubMed ID: 10762550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multipoint genetic mapping with uniparental disomy data.
    Zhao H; Li J; Robinson WP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):851-61. PubMed ID: 10958760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relative efficiencies of the chi-square recombination models for gene mapping with human pedigree data.
    Lin S; Speed TP
    Ann Hum Genet; 1999 Jan; 63(Pt 1):81-95. PubMed ID: 10738522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.
    McPeek MS; Sun L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1076-94. PubMed ID: 10712219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
    Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multipoint analysis of quantitative traits.
    Marlow AJ; John S; Worthington J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 9433588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A note on power approximations for the transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Knapp M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 10090903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of parent-of-origin effects in linkage analysis of quantitative traits.
    Hanson RL; Kobes S; Lindsay RS; Knowler WC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Apr; 68(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 11254452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parametric and nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis with imprinting and two-locus-trait models: application to mite sensitization.
    Strauch K; Fimmers R; Kurz T; Deichmann KA; Wienker TF; Baur MP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):1945-57. PubMed ID: 10796874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of genome similarity as an exploratory tool for mapping complex traits.
    Guo SW
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):877-82. PubMed ID: 8788025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: the pedigree disequilibrium test.
    Martin ER; Monks SA; Warren LL; Kaplan NL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 10825280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No bias in linkage analysis.
    Abecasis G; Cox N; Daly MJ; Kruglyak L; Laird N; Markianos K; Patterson N
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):722-3; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
    Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accounting for epistasis in linkage analysis of general pedigrees.
    Sung YJ; Wijsman EM
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 17283443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.