405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10884730)
1. Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors--which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis?
Stewart A; Reid DM
Br J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 73(866):165-71. PubMed ID: 10884730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.
Langton CM; Langton DK
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of quantitative heel ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density in chronic haemodialysis patients.
Taal MW; Cassidy MJ; Pearson D; Green D; Masud T
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Aug; 14(8):1917-21. PubMed ID: 10462271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do markers of bone resorption add to bone mineral density and ultrasonographic heel measurement for the prediction of hip fracture in elderly women? The EPIDOS prospective study.
Garnero P; Dargent-Molina P; Hans D; Schott AM; Bréart G; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 10326062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
He YQ; Fan B; Hans D; Li J; Wu CY; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Lu Y; Tsuda-Futami E; Fuerst T; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 11204441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12154392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.
Sahota O; San P; Cawte SA; Pearson D; Hosking DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost effectiveness analysis of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective pre-screen in a group of women with low trauma Colles' fractures.
Sim MF; Stone M; Johansen A; Evans W
Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 11204173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: a 10-year prospective study.
Stewart A; Kumar V; Reid DM
J Bone Miner Res; 2006 Mar; 21(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 16491289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost effectiveness analysis of using quantitative ultrasound as a selective pre-screen for bone densitometry.
Sim MF; Stone MD; Phillips CJ; Cheung WY; Johansen A; Vasishta S; Pettit RJ; Evans WD
Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15912005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximising the cost effectiveness of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective population pre-screen.
Langton CM; Ballard PA; Langton DK; Purdie DW
Technol Health Care; 1997 Jul; 5(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 9263372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
