215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10884750)
1. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gonad dose in AP pelvis radiography: Impact of anode heel orientation.
Mraity HA; England A; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 28290334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiation exposure of radiation-sensitive risk organs--ocular lens, parotid gland, thyroid gland--in dacryocystography and therapy].
Wilhelm K; Krämer S; Textor J; Ewen K; Schüller H; Schild H
Rofo; 1998 Mar; 168(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 9551114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a full and empty bladder on radiation dose to the uterus, ovaries and bladder from lumbar spine CT and X-ray examinations.
Nicholson R; Coucher J; Thornton A; Connor F
Br J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 73(876):1290-6. PubMed ID: 11205673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient doses and projection angle in cone beam CT.
He W; Huda W; Magill D; Tavrides E; Yao H
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2359-68. PubMed ID: 20527570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The efficacy of lead shielding in patient dosage reduction in computed tomography].
Hidajat N; Schröder RJ; Vogl T; Schedel H; Felix R
Rofo; 1996 Nov; 165(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 8998318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthodontic radiographic procedures--how safe are they?
Buch B; Fensham R
SADJ; 2003 Feb; 58(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 12705098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Portable TL dosemeter--ESD phantom combination for chest and lumbar spine radiography.
Niittymäki H; Hakanen A; Rautio S; Järvinen H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 18204082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normalized organ doses for various diagnostic radiologic procedures.
Gray JE; Ragozzino MW; Van Lysel MS; Burke TM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Sep; 137(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 6974456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does collimation affect patient dose in antero-posterior thoraco-lumbar spine?
Robinson JB; Ali RM; Tootell AK; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):211-215. PubMed ID: 28687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The absorbed dose to the gonads in adult patients undergoing defecographic study by digital or traditional radiographic imaging].
Zonca G; De Thomatis A; Marchesini R; Sala S; Bozzini B; Cozzi G; Milella M; Salvetti M
Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):520-3. PubMed ID: 9465219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Radiation dose in critical organs due to non-coplanar irradiation of the hypophysis].
Schulte RW; Rittmann KL; Meinass HJ; Rennicke P
Strahlenther Onkol; 1996 Sep; 172(9):501-6. PubMed ID: 8928057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose in balloon dacryocystoplasty: a study using Rando phantoms and thermoluminescent dosimetry.
Meriç N; Yüce UR; Ilgit ET
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2005 Sep; 11(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 16206060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device.
Makdissi J; Pawar RR; Johnson B; Chong BS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150245. PubMed ID: 26764582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
