These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10885527)

  • 1. Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition.
    Goh HL; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 10885527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior.
    Fritz JN; Jackson LM; Stiefler NA; Wimberly BS; Richardson AR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jul; 50(3):590-599. PubMed ID: 28513826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of procedures for programming noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Wallace MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 10885529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment.
    Wallace MD; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 23322927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior.
    Fischer SM; Iwata BA; Mazaleski JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9210304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
    Lalli JS; Casey SD; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PubMed ID: 9103988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior.
    Marcus BA; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 8881343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 11214020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Vollmer TR; Iwata BA; Zarcone JR; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8473262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of fixed-time and contingent schedules of negative reinforcement on compliance and aberrant behavior.
    Reed GK; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Barretto A; Andelman MS
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 15668078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement.
    Hagopian LP; Crockett JL; van Stone M; DeLeon IG; Bowman LG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 11214021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Newman ZA; Roscoe EM; Errera NP; Davis CR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):984-1000. PubMed ID: 33667327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.
    Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Worsdell AS; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12723863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of continuous and intermittent reinforcement for problem behavior during functional communication training.
    Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Kahng SW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 10885525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training.
    Kahng S; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Worsdell AS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):267-76; quiz 277. PubMed ID: 9210306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of a punisher assessment for decreasing automatically reinforced problem behavior.
    Verriden AL; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Feb; 52(1):205-226. PubMed ID: 30238452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets.
    Hagopian LP; Fisher WW; Legacy SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 8063630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of noncontingent reinforcement and contingent restraint to reduce physical aggression and self-injurious behaviour in a traumatically brain injured adult.
    Persel CS; Persel CH; Ashley MJ; Krych DK
    Brain Inj; 1997 Oct; 11(10):751-60. PubMed ID: 9354251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of noncontingent reinforcement and sensory extinction as treatments for self-injurious behavior.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Goh HL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):635-46. PubMed ID: 9891399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.