These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10887247)

  • 1. Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT.
    Fleischmann D; Rubin GD; Paik DS; Yen SY; Hilfiker PR; Beaulieu CF; Napel S
    Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):185-96. PubMed ID: 10887247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of eight-element multi-detector row helical CT technology for evaluation of the abdomen.
    Gupta AK; Nelson RC; Johnson GA; Paulson EK; Delong DM; Yoshizumi TT
    Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 12702826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed.
    Hu H; He HD; Foley WD; Fox SH
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 10751468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal aliasing in multislice helical computed tomography: sampling and cone-beam effects.
    La Rivière PJ; Pan X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Nov; 21(11):1366-73. PubMed ID: 12575873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT.
    Primak AN; McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Zhang J; Fletcher JG
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(6):1785-94. PubMed ID: 17102050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiplanar and 3D imaging of the central airways: comparison of image quality and radiation dose of single-detector row CT and multi-detector row CT at differing tube currents in dogs.
    Boiselle PM; Dippolito G; Copeland J; Kang H; Ahmed M; Weeks D; Halpern E; Goldberg SN
    Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 12832576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of low-contrast objects: experimental comparison of single- and multi-detector row CT with a phantom.
    Verdun FR; Denys A; Valley JF; Schnyder P; Meuli RA
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 11997548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-detector row CT artifacts that mimic disease.
    Cody DD; Stevens DM; Ginsberg LE
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):756-61. PubMed ID: 16055698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single- versus multi-detector row CT of the brain: quality assessment.
    Jones TR; Kaplan RT; Lane B; Atlas SW; Rubin GD
    Radiology; 2001 Jun; 219(3):750-5. PubMed ID: 11376264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of temporal resolution of multi-detector row computed tomography in helical acquisition mode using the impulse method.
    Ichikawa K; Hara T; Urikura A; Takata T; Ohashi K
    Phys Med; 2015 Jun; 31(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 25773882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner.
    McCollough CH; Primak AN; Saba O; Bruder H; Stierstorfer K; Raupach R; Suess C; Schmidt B; Ohnesorge BM; Flohr TG
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 17446525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Helical multidetector row quantitative computed tomography (QCT) precision.
    Bligh M; Bidaut L; White RA; Murphy WA; Stevens DM; Cody DD
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 19124100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans.
    Kasales CJ; Hopper KD; Ariola DN; TenHave TR; Meilstrup JW; Mahraj RP; Van Hook D; Westacott S; Sefczek RJ; Barr JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1281-4. PubMed ID: 7717248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging.
    Yamamuro M; Tadamura E; Kubo S; Toyoda H; Nishina T; Ohba M; Hosokawa R; Kimura T; Tamaki N; Komeda M; Kita T; Konishi J
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 15670995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation.
    Whiting BR; McFarland EG; Brink JA
    Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 11012440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality of volume rendering of the bronchial tree: Kymogram-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated and non-gated multi-row detector CT.
    Boehm T; Alkadhi H; Sennst DA; Schertler T; Kachelriess M; Kalender W; Marincek B; Wildermuth S
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 15721594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stair-step artifacts in three-dimensional helical CT: an experimental study.
    Wang G; Vannier MW
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 8134601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-detector helical CT in PET-CT: assessment of image quality.
    Römer W; Chung M; Chan A; Townsend DW; Torok F; McCook B; Federle MP; Avril N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1571-7. PubMed ID: 15150012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience.
    Juergens KU; Grude M; Maintz D; Fallenberg EM; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 14668428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Slice sensitivity profile and image pixel noise of multi-slice spiral CT in comparison with single slice spiral CT].
    Schorn C; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Kopka L; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 Sep; 171(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 10520332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.