These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10887251)

  • 1. Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: preliminary experience with experimentally created defects.
    Ludwig K; Link TM; Fiebich M; Renger B; Diederich S; Oelerich M; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):220-4. PubMed ID: 10887251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K; Lenzen H; Kamm KF; Link TM; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 11818613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography.
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Wassmer G; Hellmich M; Winnekendonk G; Andermahr J; Gossmann A; Lackner KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1397-403. PubMed ID: 11717093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K; Henschel A; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Wormanns D; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems.
    Ludwig K; Schülke C; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Lenzen H; Bernhardt TM; Brinckmann P; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 12615999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M; Galanski M; Oestmann JW; von Falkenhausen U; Rosenthal H; Reimer P; Nischelsky J; Reichelt S
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
    Awai K; Komi M; Hori S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1141-4. PubMed ID: 11641189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors].
    Salvini E; Zincone G; Fossati N; Crivellaro M; Crespi A; Loda A; Paruccini N; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 2057602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
    Ludwig K; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Link TM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
    Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of flat-panel digital to conventional film-screen radiography in detection of experimentally created lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone.
    Moorman VJ; Marshall JF; Devine DV; Payton M; Jann HW; Bahr R
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 19999339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Llewellyn HJ; Mrose HE; Pile-Spellman EA; Rubens JR; Lindemann SR
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography.
    Kim TS; Im JG; Goo JM; Lee KH; Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kim S
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 12034937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of simulated inflicted metaphyseal fractures in a fetal pig model: image optimization and dose reduction with computed radiography.
    Kleinman PL; Zurakowski D; Strauss KJ; Cleveland RH; Perez-Rosello JM; Nichols DP; Zou KH; Kleinman PK
    Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18430873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Sommer A; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.