179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10887256)
1. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience.
Orel SG; Dougherty CS; Reynolds C; Czerniecki BJ; Siegelman ES; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 10887256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study.
Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; De Felice C; Meggiorini ML; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
Radiol Med; 2008 Mar; 113(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 18386126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D-MR Ductography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Mammography in Patients with Suspicious Nipple Discharge; a Feasibility Study.
Nicholson BT; Harvey JA; Patrie JT; Mugler JP
Breast J; 2015; 21(4):352-62. PubMed ID: 25882883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic value of nipple discharge cytology: breast imaging complements predictive value of nipple discharge cytology.
Kalu ON; Chow C; Wheeler A; Kong C; Wapnir I
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Sep; 106(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 22396104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidental treatment of nipple discharge caused by benign intraductal papilloma through diagnostic Mammotome biopsy.
Dennis MA; Parker S; Kaske TI; Stavros AT; Camp J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1263-8. PubMed ID: 10789774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease.
Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Rabuffi P; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):354-65. PubMed ID: 17440697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast intraductal masses: US-guided fine-needle aspiration after galactography.
Sardanelli F; Imperiale A; Zandrino F; Calabrese M; Bonifacio A; Canavese G; Nicolo G
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 9205236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nipple discharge and the value of MR imaging.
Tjalma WA; Verslegers IO
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Aug; 115(2):234-6. PubMed ID: 15262363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy.
Orel SG; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Fraker DL; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 9356624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Singletary SE; Stephens TW; Marcy S; Meric F; Ross MI; Babiera GV; Ames FC; Kuerer HM
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Mar; 196(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12648684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results.
Lee SG; Orel SG; Woo IJ; Cruz-Jove E; Putt ME; Solin LJ; Czerniecki BJ; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):773-8. PubMed ID: 12601182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benign versus malignant breast disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography.
Fenlon HM; Phelan NC; O'Sullivan P; Tierney S; Gorey T; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9314988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Tan LK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 12876038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge.
Nakahara H; Namba K; Watanabe R; Furusawa H; Matsu T; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Tamura S
Breast Cancer; 2003; 10(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 14634510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.
Orel SG; Schnall MD; Powell CM; Hochman MG; Solin LJ; Fowble BL; Torosian MH; Rosato EF
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 7784554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional galactography and MR contrast galactography for diagnosing nipple discharge: preliminary results.
Yücesoy C; Oztürk E; Ozer Y; Edgüer T; Hekimoglu B
Korean J Radiol; 2008; 9(5):426-31. PubMed ID: 18838852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal abnormalities detected with galactography: frequency of adequate excisional biopsy.
Baker KS; Davey DD; Stelling CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):821-4. PubMed ID: 8140998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
