These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10887858)

  • 1. Learning to give and accept research critiques: some unique models.
    Ingram C
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2000; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10887858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to critique a research study.
    Fosbinder D; Loveridge C
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1996; 2(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 9447093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contributing to nursing in a new way.
    Freda MC
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2007; 32(2):70. PubMed ID: 17356408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript.
    Valente S
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16189960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to quell research anxiety.
    Banning JA
    Can Nurse; 1991 Mar; 87(3):3. PubMed ID: 2039979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurses making a difference: taking personal responsibility for using research findings.
    McCorkle R
    Cancer Nurs; 2009; 32(4):257-8. PubMed ID: 19574741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Helping nurses avoid some pitfalls on the path to publication.
    Gilmour J; Panapa S; Russell A
    Nurs N Z; 2007 Feb; 13(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 17380702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critically evaluating research studies.
    Rogers B
    AAOHN J; 1995 Jan; 43(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 7695808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research utilization in nursing: the power of one.
    Jacobson AF
    Orthop Nurs; 2000; 19(6):61-5. PubMed ID: 11899310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between the lines.
    Traynor M; Rafferty AM; Solano D
    Nurs Stand; 2003 Dec 10-16; 18(13):16-7. PubMed ID: 14694867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rural nursing research: riddle, rhyme, reality.
    Weinert C
    Commun Nurs Res; 2002; 35():37-49. PubMed ID: 12430199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The introduction of a performance-based system for funding research.
    Smith T
    Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Mar; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17205666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The critique: a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
    Schmelzer M
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 16974173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making processes transparent.
    King KM
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 12703104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Receiving feedback from reviewers: how to make the most of criticism.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(4):148-50. PubMed ID: 10786470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.