These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10888008)

  • 21. Official Veterinarian fee review.
    van Dijk J
    Vet Rec; 2010 Feb; 166(7):214. PubMed ID: 20154319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Official Veterinarian fee review.
    Dennis JD
    Vet Rec; 2010 Feb; 166(7):214. PubMed ID: 20154320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Survey of young graduates from Britain.
    Hillam R
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1994 Mar; 204(6):866-7. PubMed ID: 8188503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. RCVS fees for 2003.
    Welch AG
    Vet Rec; 2002 Jul; 151(1):31. PubMed ID: 12137427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Official Veterinarian fee review.
    Reilly B; Cutler K
    Vet Rec; 2010 Jan; 166(4):120-1. PubMed ID: 20097894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. SPVS fee survey reveals wide variation in prices.
    Vet Rec; 2015 Jul; 177(3):60. PubMed ID: 26183350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Official Veterinarian fee review.
    Cutler K
    Vet Rec; 2010 Feb; 166(9):281. PubMed ID: 20190225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Official Veterinarian fee review.
    Wray JG
    Vet Rec; 2010 Feb; 166(7):214. PubMed ID: 20154318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. OVS survey refutes claims of high veterinary fees.
    Vet Rec; 1993 Apr; 132(15):374-5. PubMed ID: 8488647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. LVI remuneration.
    Borthwick BR
    Vet Rec; 1988 Oct; 123(16):428. PubMed ID: 3201678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Survey of practice fee structure: 2. Practice turnover and costs.
    Vet Rec; 1989 Sep; 125(11):289-92. PubMed ID: 2815493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. RCVS disciplinary hearings.
    Ostle GN
    Vet Rec; 2002 Sep; 151(12):363-4; author reply 364. PubMed ID: 12371696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Official Veterinarian fee review.
    Asselbergs MJ
    Vet Rec; 2010 Feb; 166(6):181-2. PubMed ID: 20139384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Helping students to reach their full potential.
    Vet Rec; 2004 Nov; 155(22):691-2. PubMed ID: 15605534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. OV work: should the BVA tender on behalf of the profession?
    Vet Rec; 2010 Jul; 167(4):114-5. PubMed ID: 20656988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Local veterinary inspector/Official Veterinarian fee review.
    Brown C; Blayney N
    Vet Rec; 2008 Aug; 163(5):162. PubMed ID: 18677002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CMA review 'could lead to higher vet fees'.
    Loeb J
    Vet Rec; 2024 Jun; 194(12):455. PubMed ID: 38874136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Reaction to 'veterinary fees 2010'].
    Engel J
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2010 Mar; 135(6):250; author reply 250-1. PubMed ID: 20415026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Keeping up with the Joneses--comparison of fees.
    Osborne D
    Can Vet J; 2007 Mar; 48(3):245-7, 249. PubMed ID: 17436901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feeling okay about your fees?
    Barton-Dobenin J; Samuelson M
    Vet Med Small Anim Clin; 1981 Jul; 76(7):1050-4. PubMed ID: 6914087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.