913 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10888102)
1. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
Jamieson WR; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Lichtenstein SV; Fradet GJ; Janusz MT
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
Sarris GE; Robbins RC; Miller DC; Mitchell RS; Moore KA; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-years' clinical experience with the Sorin Pericarbon valve.
Folliguet TA; Dibie A; Czitrom D; Le Bret E; Laborde F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 10888101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of the valve position on the complications related to pericardial Carpentier-Edwards valve after 8 years].
Aupart M; Dreyfus X; Meurisse Y; May MA; Sirinelli A; Marchand M
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1995 Jul; 88(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 7487327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomised, prospective evaluation of a new pericardial heart valve: outcome after seven years.
Wheatley DJ; Tolland MM; Pathi V; Bernacca GM; Murray GD; Davidson KG; Breeze P; Cobbe SM
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1995; 9(5):259-67; discussion 267-8. PubMed ID: 7662379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five-year evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Janusz MT; Chaitman BR; Tyers FO; Miyagishima RT
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Sep; 88(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 6381888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.
Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Gerein AN; Pomar J
Can J Surg; 1992 Apr; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance.
Jamieson WR; Allen P; Miyagishima RT; Gerein AN; Munro AI; Burr LH; Tyers GF
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Tyers GF; Munro AI
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8162218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve.
Cohen G; Zagorski B; Christakis GT; Joyner CD; Vincent J; Sever J; Harbi S; Feder-Elituv R; Moussa F; Goldman BS; Fremes SE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 139(4):848-59. PubMed ID: 20080264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.
Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Janusz MT; Ling H
Circulation; 1991 Nov; 84(5 Suppl):III145-52. PubMed ID: 1934404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
