These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10888275)

  • 1. Effect of prefabricated metal post-head design on the retention of various core materials.
    Zalkind M; Shkury S; Stern N; Heling I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jun; 27(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 10888275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):624-8. PubMed ID: 10842128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Assessment of Retention and Resistance Failure Loads of Teeth Restored with a Complete Coverage Restoration and Different Core Materials.
    Tsiagali V; Kirmanidou Y; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e229-e236. PubMed ID: 29143388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 11199599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of design of pre-fabricated posts and post heads on the retention of various cements and core materials.
    Hochman N; Feinzaig I; Zalkind M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 12791155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compressive shear strength of core materials and restoring techniques.
    Sahmali SM; Saygili G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Jun; 20(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 11203569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of the fracture resistance of nyyar cores of three restorative materials.
    Ferrier S; Sekhon BS; Brunton PA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 18505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of design of prefabricated post heads on core materials.
    Chang WC; Millstein PL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 May; 69(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 8483126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs.
    Bolhuis HPB ; De Gee AJ; Feilzer AJ; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11803991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Materials used in prefabricated post and core systems. A review of the literature.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL
    Tex Dent J; 2006 Apr; 123(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 16761651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restoration and reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with a polyethylene ribbon and prefabricated fiberglass post.
    Kimmel SS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 12004666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions.
    Kovarik RE; Breeding LC; Caughman WF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 1403934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the retention of 5 core materials supported by a dental post.
    Gu S; Isidro M; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):183-4. PubMed ID: 16602368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The comparison of retention of diferent post and core systems].
    Wang N; Chen X; He T; Yang Y; Zhang G; Wu X; Li P; Niu L
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 24(1):133-5. PubMed ID: 17333907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention and failure mode after cyclic loading in two post and core systems.
    Stegaroiu R; Yamada H; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 May; 75(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 8709015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.