74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10889107)
21. Fibril density reduction in keratoconic corneas.
Zhou D; Abass A; Lopes B; Eliasy A; Hayes S; Boote C; Meek KM; Movchan A; Movchan N; Elsheikh A
J R Soc Interface; 2021 Feb; 18(175):20200900. PubMed ID: 33622146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pentacam® Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part I.
Motlagh MN; Moshirfar M; Murri MS; Skanchy DF; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ronquillo YC; Hoopes PC
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2019; 8(3):177-203. PubMed ID: 31598520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of corneal curvature parameters obtained from two different instruments-Pentacam and VX120.
Zhang QW; Zhai CB; Ma DL
Int J Ophthalmol; 2019; 12(8):1311-1316. PubMed ID: 31456922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.
Hastings GD; Applegate RA; Nguyen LC; Kauffman MJ; Hemmati RT; Marsack JD
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Apr; 96(4):238-247. PubMed ID: 30943184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Study and characterization of morphogeometric parameters to assist diagnosis of keratoconus.
Cavas-Martínez F; Fernández-Pacheco DG; Parras D; Cañavate FJF; Bataille L; Alió J
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Nov; 17(Suppl 1):161. PubMed ID: 30458789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Keratoconus severity identification using unsupervised machine learning.
Yousefi S; Yousefi E; Takahashi H; Hayashi T; Tampo H; Inoda S; Arai Y; Asbell P
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205998. PubMed ID: 30399144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of the anterior-posterior corneal radius ratio on intraocular lens power calculation errors.
Hasegawa A; Kojima T; Yamamoto M; Kato Y; Tamaoki A; Ichikawa K
Clin Ophthalmol; 2018; 12():1549-1558. PubMed ID: 30214138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Simulated Keratometry and Total Refractive Power for Keratoconus According to the Stage of Amsler-Krumeich Classification.
Kamiya K; Kono Y; Takahashi M; Shoji N
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12436. PubMed ID: 30127375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Agreement between Keratometric readings by VERION image guided System, Galilei G4 and Pentacam.
Habib A; Khan MS; Ishaq M; Yaqub MA
Pak J Med Sci; 2018; 34(3):740-743. PubMed ID: 30034450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Anterior, Posterior, and Total Corneal Astigmatism Measured Using a Single Scheimpflug Camera in Healthy and Keratoconus Eyes.
Choi Y; Eom Y; Song JS; Kim HM
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):163-171. PubMed ID: 29770640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characteristics of Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Different Stages of Keratoconus.
Aslani F; Khorrami-Nejad M; Aghazadeh Amiri M; Hashemian H; Askarizadeh F; Khosravi B
J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2018; 13(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 29403582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repeatability of corneal elevation maps in keratoconus patients using the tomography matching method.
Zheng Y; Huang L; Zhao Y; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang W; Geraghty B; Wang Q; Chen S; Bao F; Elsheikh A
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17457. PubMed ID: 29234085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density with Corneal Tomographic Parameters in Eyes with Keratoconus.
Bozkurt B; Yılmaz M; Meşen A; Kamış Ü; Ekinci Köktekir B; Okudan S
Turk J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 47(5):255-260. PubMed ID: 29109893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new approach to keratoconus detection based on corneal morphogeometric analysis.
Cavas-Martínez F; Bataille L; Fernández-Pacheco DG; Cañavate FJF; Alió JL
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184569. PubMed ID: 28886157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes.
Naderan M; Jahanrad A; Farjadnia M
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 28647782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical outcomes of MyoRing implantation in keratoconic eyes by using the Femtosecond laser technology.
Nasrollahi K; Rezaei L; Ghoreishi M; Kashfi A; Mahboubi M
J Med Life; 2015; 8(Spec Iss 3):66-71. PubMed ID: 28316668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Anterior segment characteristics in normal and keratoconus eyes evaluated with a combined Scheimpflug/Placido corneal imaging device.
Safarzadeh M; Nasiri N
J Curr Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 28(3):106-11. PubMed ID: 27579453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MyoRing Implantation in Keratoconic Patients: 3 years Follow-up Data.
Janani L; Jadidi K; Mosavi SA; Nejat F; Naderi M; Nourijelyani K
J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2016; 11(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 27195081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictive Ability of Galilei to Distinguish Subclinical Keratoconus and Keratoconus from Normal Corneas.
Feizi S; Yaseri M; Kheiri B
J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2016; 11(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 27195079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A case of unilateral circumscribed posterior keratoconus evaluated by three different imaging tools: optical coherence tomography, videokeratography, and Scheimpflug corneal tomography.
Spadea L; Maraone G; Cagini C
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):279-283. PubMed ID: 27177621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
