BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10889859)

  • 21. Breast cancer screening for women 40 to 49 years of age: what is a clinician to do?
    Gemignani ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):548-9. PubMed ID: 17766597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer.
    Cohen M
    Psychooncology; 2006 Oct; 15(10):873-83. PubMed ID: 16374894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Free breast cancer screening utilization and results.
    Davis SW; Wilson CM; Engstrom PF; Samson BT
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():145-52. PubMed ID: 3671402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experience with breast cancer, pre-screening perceived susceptibility and the psychological impact of screening.
    Absetz P; Aro AR; Sutton SR
    Psychooncology; 2003 Jun; 12(4):305-18. PubMed ID: 12748969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risks of false-positive breast cancer screening results.
    Levine D; French L
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 9673600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. St John Breast Cancer Screening Clinic: a twelve-year review.
    Yandell HR; Barbee RF; Mauritson DF
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 1987 Aug; 80(8):581-4. PubMed ID: 3655973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.
    Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re: Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.
    Kopans DB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(15):1186-7; author reply 1187. PubMed ID: 15292393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity of short-term consequences of cancer prevention and screening activities?
    Brodersen J; Thorsen H; Cockburn J
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):244; author reply 244-5. PubMed ID: 15625383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?
    Fenton JJ; Barton MB; Geiger AM; Herrinton LJ; Rolnick SJ; Harris EL; Barlow WE; Reisch LM; Fletcher SW; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):67-71. PubMed ID: 16287888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. High-risk screening: multi-modality surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer (proven or suspected carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene).
    Kuhl CK
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):103-6. PubMed ID: 12585663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does mammography add any benefit to a thorough clinical breast examination (CBE)?
    Kane KY; Lindbloom EJ; Stevermer JJ
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1078. PubMed ID: 11132055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. "False alarm" mammography results--how do women react?
    Kahn BE
    LDI Issue Brief; 2003 Feb; 8(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12678009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Screening for breast cancer: are physicians doing enough?
    Gemson DH
    N Y State J Med; 1990 Jun; 90(6):285-7. PubMed ID: 2370982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Shen Y; Parmigiani G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Screening for breast cancer on basis of individual risk assessment for women ineligible for the national population screening program].
    van Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; van der Horst F; de Koning HJ; Rutgers EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 11206121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.