These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10889902)

  • 21. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
    Hanley JR; Shah N
    Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Semantic encoding in working memory: is there a (multi)modality effect?
    Delogu F; Raffone A; Belardinelli MO
    Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):655-63. PubMed ID: 19536688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of auditory features in memory span for words.
    Drewnowski A; Murdock BB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 May; 6(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 7373250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
    Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced recency effects with changing-state and primary-linguistic stimuli.
    Kallman HJ; Cameron P
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 2725269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inter- and intra-individual variation in immediate free recall: an examination of serial position functions and recall initiation strategies.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Memory; 2011 Jan; 19(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 21240749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recency and the modality effect in immediate ordered recall.
    Frick RW
    Can J Psychol; 1989 Dec; 43(4):494-511. PubMed ID: 2519915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of same-modality interference on immediate serial recall of auditory and visual information.
    Turner ML; Johnson SK; McNamara DS; Engle RW
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jul; 119(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 1447561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Phonological and perceptual components of short-term memory for odors.
    White TL; Hornung DE; Kurtz DB; Treisman M; Sheehe P
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(3):411-34. PubMed ID: 9805362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory.
    Parmentier FB; Tremblay S; Jones DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 15260195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effects of list length and output order.
    Ward G; Tan L; Grenfell-Essam R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1207-41. PubMed ID: 20804293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recency effect in recall of a word list when an immediate memory task is performed after each word presentation.
    Watkins MJ; Neath I; Sechler ES
    Am J Psychol; 1989; 102(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2729453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Single-probe serial position recall: evidence of modularity for olfactory, visual, and auditory short-term memory.
    Johnson AJ; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 18728997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Verbal short-term memory as an articulatory system: evidence from an alternative paradigm.
    Cheung H; Wooltorton L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):195-223. PubMed ID: 11873847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Serial position effects in 2-alternative forced choice recognition: functional equivalence across visual and auditory modalities.
    Johnson AJ; Miles C
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 19105090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An alternative interpretation of the stimulus suffix effect.
    Parkinson SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Jul; 4(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 670906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.