BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10890126)

  • 1. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Lautischer M; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Hearing and speech discrimination scores of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD; Egelierler B; Adunka O
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):492-7. PubMed ID: 10890127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
    Gstoettner WK; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Sep; 118(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 9840498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
    Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor.
    Anderson I; Weichbold V; D'Haese P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2002 Apr; 81(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 11987740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Long term results after cochlear implantation in elderly patients].
    Herzog M; Schön F; Müller J; Knaus C; Scholtz L; Helms J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2003 Jul; 82(7):490-3. PubMed ID: 12886496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Experiences in Kiel with the cochlear implant].
    Müller-Deile J; Schmidt BJ; Rudert H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun; 73(6):300-10. PubMed ID: 8060448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear implant hearing performance at the University of Minnesota.
    Kimberley BP; Lee A; Scheller L; Levine S; Adams G; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2921782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of ceiling effects occurring with speech recognition tests in adult cochlear-implanted patients.
    Helms J; Weichbold V; Baumann U; von Specht H; Schön F; Müller J; Esser B; Ziese M; Anderson I; D'Haese P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 15316233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.