106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10892862)
1. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data.
Spry PG; Bates AB; Johnson CA; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2192-200. PubMed ID: 10892862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression.
Gardiner SK; Crabb DP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1400-7. PubMed ID: 11980853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.
Spry PG; Johnson CA; Bates AB; Turpin A; Chauhan BC
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 120(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 11831919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study.
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Coleman AL; Liu G; Li G; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1627-35. PubMed ID: 15350314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.
Manassakorn A; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Koucheki B; Law SK; Caprioli J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2896-903. PubMed ID: 16799031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.
Caprioli J; Coleman AL
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1123-1129.e3. PubMed ID: 18082889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss.
McKendrick AM; Turpin A
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15630403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability in glaucomatous visual fields: implications for shared care schemes.
Henson DB; Spry PG; Spencer IC; Sparrow JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Mar; 18(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 9692031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of algorithms for calculating glaucoma change probability confidence intervals.
Meng S; Turpin A; Lazarescu M; Ivins J
J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):405-13. PubMed ID: 16988603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
Mayama C; Araie M; Suzuki Y; Ishida K; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y; Shirakashi M; Abe H; Tsukamoto H; Mishima HK; Yoshimura K; Ohashi Y
Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity differences between real-patient and computer-stimulated visual fields.
Vesti E; Spry PG; Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
J Glaucoma; 2002 Feb; 11(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 11821688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma.
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4346-51. PubMed ID: 15557442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term fluctuation as an estimate of variability in visual field data.
Casson EJ; Shapiro LR; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 31(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 2243009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24-2 visual fields.
Tattersall CL; Vernon SA; Menon GJ
Eye (Lond); 2007 Mar; 21(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 16424913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive factors of the optic nerve head for development or progression of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Jonas JB; Martus P; Horn FK; Jünemann A; Korth M; Budde WM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2613-8. PubMed ID: 15277484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 18078852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
