305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10892865)
1. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results.
Nelson-Quigg JM; Cello K; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2212-21. PubMed ID: 10892865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.
Jampel HD; Friedman DS; Quigley H; Miller R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 11923247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination.
Kotecha A; O'Leary N; Melmoth D; Grant S; Crabb DP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 18806294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices.
Asaoka R; Crabb DP; Yamashita T; Russell RA; Wang YX; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(9):7007-11. PubMed ID: 21810985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analysis of light sensitivities in central 30-degree visual field of normal Chinese and glaucoma patients.
Li Y; Wu Z; Jiang Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Feb; 110(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 9594284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.
Chun YS; Shin JH; Park IK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 56(1):451-7. PubMed ID: 25564449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binocular summation in the fovea and peripheral field of anisometropic amblyopes.
Pardhan S; Whitaker A
Curr Eye Res; 2000 Jan; 20(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 10611713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Associations of visual function with physical outcomes and limitations 5 years later in an older population: the Beaver Dam eye study.
Klein BE; Moss SE; Klein R; Lee KE; Cruickshanks KJ
Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):644-50. PubMed ID: 12689880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two eyes: square root 2 better than one?
Simpson WA; Manahilov V; Shahani U
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 19406375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas.
de la Rosa MG; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Lozano-Lopez V; Mendez MS; de la Vega RR
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binocular interaction in post-LASIK subjects with unsatisfactory outcome.
Subramaniam SV
Curr Eye Res; 2009 Dec; 34(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 19958121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between GDx VCC parameter and achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Iester M; Perdicchi A; De Feo F; Fiesoletti E; Amodeo S; Sanna G; Leonardi A; Calabria G
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 16865003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
