These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10893473)

  • 1. Effective treatment plan for maxillary protraction: is the bone age useful to determine the treatment plan?
    Suda N; Ishii-Suzuki M; Hirose K; Hiyama S; Suzuki S; Kuroda T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 10893473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla.
    Merwin D; Ngan P; Hagg U; Yiu C; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 9294359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Maxillary features following protraction headgear therapy in skeletal Class III patients].
    Viteporn S; Mathurasai W
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990; 40(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 2074327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion.
    Ngan P; Wei SH; Hagg U; Yiu CK; Merwin D; Stickel B
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The profile enhancer (reverse-pull headgear).
    Jackson DW
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(3):21-5. PubMed ID: 19835183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary corticotomy and extraoral orthopedic traction in mature teenage patients: a case report.
    Pelo S; Boniello R; Gasparini G; Longobardi G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):76-84. PubMed ID: 17618333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J; Full CA; Andreasen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy on the pharyngeal airway.
    Kaygisiz E; Tuncer BB; Yüksel S; Tuncer C; Yildiz C
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jul; 79(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 19537871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Combined rapid palatal expansion (RPE), edgewise technique and protraction headgear in correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion].
    Xiang W; Lu M; Shi X; Lu H
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Oct; 20(5):353-5. PubMed ID: 12607366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions.
    Arman A; Toygar TU; Abuhijleh E
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 15673133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term efficacy of reverse pull headgear therapy.
    Wells AP; Sarver DM; Proffit WR
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):915-22. PubMed ID: 17090164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When Do Skeletal Class III Patients Wear Their Reverse Pull Headgears?
    Ozkalayci N; Cicek O
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3546262. PubMed ID: 28377927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.
    Cha BK; Choi DS; Ngan P; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Kim SM; Jang IS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The early management of Class III malocclusions using protraction headgear.
    Macey-Dare LV
    Dent Update; 2000 Dec; 27(10):508-13. PubMed ID: 11218613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Bilbo EE; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Allareddy V; Holton N; Thames AM; Otsby MS; Southard TE
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 29667470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.