203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10893724)
1. Nuremberg's legacy: some ethical reflections.
Childress JF
Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):347-61. PubMed ID: 10893724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicine and conscience: the debate on medical ethics and research in Germany 50 years after Nuremberg.
Wunder M
Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 10893726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Care of the medical ethos, with some comments on research: reflections after the holocaust.
Barondess JA
Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):308-24. PubMed ID: 10893721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics.
Moreno JD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 9212522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US medical researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code. A review of findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
Faden RR; Lederer SE; Moreno JD
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1667-71. PubMed ID: 8922454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Nuremberg doctors' trial in historical context.
Marrus MR
Bull Hist Med; 1999; 73(1):106-23. PubMed ID: 10189729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.
Katz J
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Too hard to face.
Caplan AL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 16186207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethics and human rights: a historical perspective.
Baker R
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 11414180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Law and public policy in human studies research.
Mishkin B
Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 10893725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Thirty years of bioethics: the Helsinki Declaration 1964-2003.
Riis P
New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 15706666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Justice in Nuremberg: the doctors' trial--60 years later. A reminder.
Adam YG
Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-5. PubMed ID: 17402338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.
Shuster E
N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The legacy of academic medicine and human exploitation in the Third Reich.
Seidelman WE
Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 10893722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
Michels R
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code.
Vollmann J; Winau R
BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1445-9. PubMed ID: 8973233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. medical research in the developing world: ignoring Nuremberg.
Roman J
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2002; 11(2):441-60. PubMed ID: 12058774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenges to human subject protections in US medical research.
Woodward B
JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(20):1947-52. PubMed ID: 10580461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Nuremberg Code 70 Years Later.
Moreno JD; Schmidt U; Joffe S
JAMA; 2017 Sep; 318(9):795-796. PubMed ID: 28817743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reflections on the Nuremberg declaration of the German medical assembly.
Shmuel R
Isr Med Assoc J; 2012 Sep; 14(9):532-4. PubMed ID: 23101413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
