These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10893849)

  • 1. [Consistency and validity of the evaluation of the clinical chart].
    Navarrete-Navarro S; López-García GA; Hernández-Sierra JF; Mejía-Arangure JM; Rubio-Rodríguez S
    Gac Med Mex; 2000; 136(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10893849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chart documentation quality and its relationship to the validity of administrative data discharge records.
    So L; Beck CA; Brien S; Kennedy J; Feasby TE; Ghali WA; Hude Quan
    Health Informatics J; 2010 Jun; 16(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 20573643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of family physicians' performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview.
    Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Racette P; Sieber W
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 17986671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The loss of reliability in data extraction from clinical histories: the source of the flaws and the usefulness of training].
    Gómez de la Cámara A; Ciruelo Monge E; de la Cruz Bértolo J; Serrano Díaz JM; Pato Cour E; Gómez-Reino Carnota JJ
    Med Clin (Barc); 1997 Mar; 108(10):377-81. PubMed ID: 9139144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observer variation in an audit of charts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Wright FV; Helewa A; Goldsmith CH; Doshi N
    Physiother Can; 1992; 44(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 10119257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to limit the burden of data collection for Quality Indicators based on medical records? The COMPAQH experience.
    Corriol C; Daucourt V; Grenier C; Minvielle E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Oct; 8():215. PubMed ID: 18940005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Race/ethnicity in medical charts and administrative databases of patients served by community health centers.
    Maizlish N; Herrera L
    Ethn Dis; 2006; 16(2):483-7. PubMed ID: 17682252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Documentation on withdrawal of life support in adult patients in the intensive care unit.
    Kirchhoff KT; Anumandla PR; Foth KT; Lues SN; Gilbertson-White SH
    Am J Crit Care; 2004 Jul; 13(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 15293586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of data taken from medical charts.
    Canfield M; Clarkin J; Coyne L; Grob M
    Psychiatr Hosp; 1986; 17(4):173-9. PubMed ID: 10282439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing quality and efficiency of discharge summaries.
    Rao P; Andrei A; Fried A; Gonzalez D; Shine D
    Am J Med Qual; 2005; 20(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 16280397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Chinese version of the satisfaction with the nursing home instrument.
    Lee LY; Lee DT; Woo J; Wong EM
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1574-82. PubMed ID: 17118080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ensuring high accuracy of data abstracted from patient charts: the use of a standardized medical record as a training tool.
    Pan L; Fergusson D; Schweitzer I; Hebert PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):918-23. PubMed ID: 16085195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agreement between self-reports and medical records was only fair in a cross-sectional study of performance of annual eye examinations among adults with diabetes in managed care.
    Beckles GL; Williamson DF; Brown AF; Gregg EW; Karter AJ; Kim C; Dudley RA; Safford MM; Stevens MR; Thompson TJ
    Med Care; 2007 Sep; 45(9):876-83. PubMed ID: 17712258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.
    Cassidy LD; Marsh GM; Holleran MK; Ruhl LS
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 8(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 12234019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the reliability of the Johns Hopkins/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality hospital disaster drill evaluation tool.
    Kaji AH; Lewis RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Sep; 52(3):204-10, 210.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17933427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The need for standardisation of peak flow charts.
    Reddel HK; Vincent SD; Civitico J
    Thorax; 2005 Feb; 60(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 15681507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital chart review provided more accurate comorbidity information than data from a general practitioner survey or an administrative database.
    Preen DB; Holman CD; Lawrence DM; Baynham NJ; Semmens JB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1295-304. PubMed ID: 15617956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-volume chart: the minimum number of days required to obtain reliable results.
    Schick E; Jolivet-Tremblay M; Dupont C; Bertrand PE; Tessier J
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 12579624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a measure of clinical information systems expectations and experiences.
    Wakefield DS; Halbesleben JR; Ward MM; Qiu Q; Brokel J; Crandall D
    Med Care; 2007 Sep; 45(9):884-90. PubMed ID: 17712259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.