These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10895618)

  • 1. Some principles in the selection and use of some tooth-coloured materials and techniques--1998.
    Bryant R
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1998 Oct; 14():86-93. PubMed ID: 10895618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of delayed polishing on gap formation of cervical restorations.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11817470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth.
    Huth KC; Manhart J; Selbertinger A; Paschos E; Kaaden C; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15241910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Esthetic restoration of the posterior sector. State of the art].
    Prati C; Tiozzi E; Giommoni E
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Nov-15; 58(17):72-6, 79-85. PubMed ID: 2289593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treating patients with CARE (comfortable aesthetic restorations): reducing postoperative sensitivity in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Ward DH
    Dent Today; 2004 Aug; 23(8):60, 62, 64-5. PubMed ID: 15354708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The controlled placement and delayed polymerization technique for the direct Class 2 posterior composite restoration.
    Atlas AM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Nov; 26(11):812-8, 820-2. PubMed ID: 16300237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of conditioner and restorative resin on enamel bond strengths.
    Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Heymann HO; Rosa BT
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 11764833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentin/enamel adhesives in pediatric dentistry.
    García-Godoy F; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):462-4. PubMed ID: 12412961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report.
    Magne P
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):747-9. PubMed ID: 11404870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strength of compomers to human enamel.
    Tate WH; You C; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 11203832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.