BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10895629)

  • 1. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A radiographic method for measuring radiation dose based on beam quality.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 9879218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quality assurance program in dental radiographic units in western Greece.
    Stavrianou K; Pappous G; Pallikarakis N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 May; 99(5):622-7. PubMed ID: 15829888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic contrast. A comparative study of three dental X-ray films.
    Tamburus JR; Lavrador MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 9442609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation protection in dental X-ray surgeries--still rooms for improvement.
    Hart G; Dugdale M
    Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):E16. PubMed ID: 23519002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Questionnaire survey on the use of dental X-ray film and equipment among general practitioners in the Swedish Public Dental Health Service.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Aug; 53(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 7484105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survey of dental radiological practice in Turkey.
    Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Bayirli G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 15961596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes of Swedish dentists to the choice of dental X-ray film and collimator for oral radiology.
    Svenson B; Söderfeldt B; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 9084265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose reduction of intraoral dental radiography in Spain.
    Alcaraz M; Navarro C; Vicente V; Canteras M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 16798929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.