These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10895851)

  • 1. Differences in the performance of commercially available 10-g monofilaments.
    Booth J; Young MJ
    Diabetes Care; 2000 Jul; 23(7):984-8. PubMed ID: 10895851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and durability of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: what is the useful service life?
    Lavery LA; Lavery DE; Lavery DC; Lafontaine J; Bharara M; Najafi B
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2012 Sep; 97(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 22560793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semmes-weinstein monofilaments: influence of temperature, humidity, and age.
    Haloua MH; Sierevelt I; Theuvenet WJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 36(7):1191-6. PubMed ID: 21712138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07/10 gram monofilament: the long and the short of it.
    McGill M; Molyneaux L; Yue DK
    Diabet Med; 1998 Jul; 15(7):615-7. PubMed ID: 9686703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory testing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers using a 10 g Owen Mumford monofilament.
    Arseculeratne YM; Cherry GW
    J Wound Care; 2003 Jun; 12(6):215-7. PubMed ID: 12838598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Buckling Force Variability of Semmes⁻Weinstein Monofilaments in Successive Use Determined by Manual and Automated Operation.
    Chikai M; Ino S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 30781464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements.
    McGill M; Molyneaux L; Spencer R; Heng LF; Yue DK
    Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The durability of the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07 monofilament.
    Yong R; Karas TJ; Smith KD; Petrov O
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2000; 39(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 10658948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the mechanics of monofilaments used in touch sensory perception.
    Virgin LN
    Med Eng Phys; 2024 Jan; 123():104083. PubMed ID: 38365337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of calibrated and non-calibrated 5.07 nylon monofilaments.
    Smith KD; Emerzian GJ; Petrov O
    Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Oct; 21(10):852-5. PubMed ID: 11128017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoral measurement of tactile and filament-prick pain threshold using shortened Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Komiyama O; Gracely RH; Kawara M; Laat AD
    Clin J Pain; 2008 Jan; 24(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18180631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diabetic foot screening: new technology versus 10g monofilament.
    Spruce MC; Bowling FL
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2012 Mar; 11(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 22334598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration and Modeling of the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament for Diabetic Foot Management.
    Castro-Martins P; Pinto-Coelho L; Campilho RDSG
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 39329628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Traditional Methods versus Quantitative Sensory Testing of the Feet at Risk: Results from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study.
    Rinkel WD; Castro Cabezas M; Setyo JH; Van Neck JW; Coert JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Mar; 139(3):752e-763e. PubMed ID: 28234858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of normal human variability and hand activity on sensory testing with the full Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments kit.
    Massy-Westropp N
    J Hand Ther; 2002; 15(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 11866352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test.
    Weinstein S
    J Hand Ther; 1993; 6(1):11-22; discussion 50. PubMed ID: 8343870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Brush Allodynia and Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing in the Detection of Allodynia Within Regions of Secondary Hyperalgesia in Humans.
    Maracle EC; Hung LY; Fell SI; Osmond MR; Brown SH; Srbely JZ
    Pain Pract; 2017 Jan; 17(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 26936430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Threshold detection and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Bell-Krotoski JA; Fess EE; Figarola JH; Hiltz D
    J Hand Ther; 1995; 8(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 7550627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normal values for sensory thresholds in the cervical dermatomes: a critical note on the use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Voerman VF; van Egmond J; Crul BJ
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1999; 78(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9923425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the variation in sensory test results using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Chikai M; Ozawa E; Takahashi N; Nunokawa K; Ino S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():1259-62. PubMed ID: 26736496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.