These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10896012)

  • 1. Heart rate response to two lifting techniques.
    Revuelta N; Dauphin A; Kowslowski O; Dubois D; Thevenon A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 81(7):958-9. PubMed ID: 10896012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of release height on center of pressure and trunk muscle response following sudden release of stoop lifting tasks.
    Chow DH; Cheng AC; Holmes AD; Evans JH
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):611-9. PubMed ID: 14559422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Is the orthopedically correct lifting technique rational from a cardiopulmonary and metabolic viewpoint?].
    Fromme A; Reer R; Pichol A; Jerosch J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 9214175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies.
    Welbergen E; Kemper HC; Knibbe JJ; Toussaint HM; Clysen L
    Ergonomics; 1991 May; 34(5):613-24. PubMed ID: 1884712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can low back loading during lifting be reduced by placing one leg beside the object to be lifted?
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    Phys Ther; 2006 Aug; 86(8):1091-105. PubMed ID: 16879043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of semi-rigid lumbosacral orthosis use on oxygen consumption during repetitive stoop and squat lifting.
    Duplessis DH; Greenway EH; Keene KL; Lee IE; Clayton RL; Metzler T; Underwood FB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 9629064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological and subjective responses to maximal repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat technique.
    Hagen KB; Hallén J; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1993; 67(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 8299594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postural perturbation and muscular response following sudden release during symmetric squat and stoop lifting.
    Chow DH; Cheng IY; Holmes AD; Evans JH
    Ergonomics; 2005 May; 48(6):591-607. PubMed ID: 16087496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The physiological costs of box lifting.
    Hake M; Michael ED
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1977 Dec; 6(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 617652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological stresses in warehouse operations with special reference to lifting technique and gender: a case study.
    Garg A; Saxena U
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Feb; 46(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 3976494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of weight and frequency on thigh and lower-trunk motion during repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat techniques.
    Hagen K; Sørhagen O; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1995 Apr; 10(3):122-127. PubMed ID: 11415542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From Stoop to Squat: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lumbar Loading Among Different Lifting Styles.
    von Arx M; Liechti M; Connolly L; Bangerter C; Meier ML; Schmid S
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():769117. PubMed ID: 34805121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.
    Garg A; Saxena U
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Oct; 40(10):894-503. PubMed ID: 525616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscular and centre of pressure response to sudden release of load in symmetric and asymmetric stoop lifting tasks.
    Chow DH; Cheng IY; Holmes AD; Evans JH
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15627417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
    Dehghan P; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of lifting technique on perceptual and cardiovascular responses to submaximal repetitive lifting.
    Hagen KB; Harms-Ringdahl K; Hallén J
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1994; 68(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 7957138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic lifting capacity: the relationship between peak force and weight as an indicator of effort.
    Hazard RG; Reeves V; Weisman G; Fleming BC; Pope MH
    J Spinal Disord; 1991 Mar; 4(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 1839668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.