These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10896012)

  • 21. Comparison of stoop versus prone postures for a simulated agricultural harvesting task.
    Meyer RH; Radwin RG
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Sep; 38(5):549-55. PubMed ID: 17113564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feasibility of physical training after myocardial infarction and its effect on return to work, morbidity and mortality.
    Palatsi I
    Acta Med Scand Suppl; 1976; 599():7-84. PubMed ID: 16981325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Squat, stoop, or semi-squat: a comparative experiment on lifting technique.
    Wang Z; Wu L; Sun J; He L; Wang S; Yang L
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Aug; 32(4):630-636. PubMed ID: 22886983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A review of research on techniques for lifting low-lying objects: 2. Evidence for a correct technique.
    Straker LM
    Work; 2003; 20(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 12671202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
    Dehghan P; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the lumbar spine during "free squat" weight lift training.
    Walsh JC; Quinlan JF; Stapleton R; FitzPatrick DP; McCormack D
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Jun; 35(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 17307893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mathematical and empirical proof of principle for an on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD).
    Abdoli-Eramaki M; Stevenson JM; Reid SA; Bryant TJ
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1694-700. PubMed ID: 17466313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metabolic cost and subjective assessment of palletizing and subsequent recovery.
    Kumar S; Lechelt EC; Narayan Y; Chouinard K
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):677-90. PubMed ID: 10902879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Reaction of the cardiovascular system with lifting and lowering of loads].
    Peikert D; Kobryn U
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1990 May; 36(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 2368458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Regional changes in spine posture at lift onset with changes in lift distance and lift style.
    Gill KP; Bennett SJ; Savelsbergh GJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1599-604. PubMed ID: 17621206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Stoop-Squat-Index: a simple but powerful measure for quantifying whole-body lifting behavior.
    Schmid S
    Arch Physiother; 2022 Apr; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 35449120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of respiratory function during Reeves stretcher use.
    Yates AM; Dunn CS; Hostler D
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(2):210-2. PubMed ID: 17454810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of technique and shaft configuration in snow shoveling on physiologic, kinematic, kinetic and productivity variables.
    McGorry RW; Dempsey PG; Leamon TB
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 12737922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychophysical and psychosocial comparison of squat and stoop lifting by young females.
    Straker L; Duncan P
    Aust J Physiother; 2000; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11676787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of task variables and their interactions in lifting and lowering loads.
    Mital A; Ayoub MM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 42(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 7234678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Evaluation of work load and related factors during asymmetric lifting with surface electromyography].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 16701028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the physiologic effects of acute whole-body vibration exercise in young and older people.
    Cochrane DJ; Sartor F; Winwood K; Stannard SR; Narici MV; Rittweger J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 18452726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique.
    van Dieën JH; Hoozemans MJ; Toussaint HM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Dec; 14(10):685-96. PubMed ID: 10545622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.