These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1089879)

  • 21. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia.
    Brehm JG; Smith SM
    W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Utilization review: surveillance reduces admissions.
    Dodds JJ
    Hospitals; 1974 Dec; 48(23):52-5. PubMed ID: 4473419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhancing utilization review program results.
    Martin M; Milstein A; Loveland DV
    Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 10286636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality assurance in the provision of hospital care. Case study. Audit network aids continuing medical education.
    Davidson RC; Lein JN; Kelday JM
    Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):85-8. PubMed ID: 4856109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Kentucky foundation for medical care. PSRO, peer review and continuing education status report of KFMC.
    Hull DA
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1973 Mar; 71(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 4734672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ambulatory medical care data: the San Joaquin Foundation peer review system.
    Harrington DC
    Med Care; 1973; 11(2):Suppl:185-9. PubMed ID: 4571099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PSRO, quality assurance, audit and education. A solution.
    St Mary EW
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1974 Feb; 61(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 4858739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medicare and Medicaid programs; entities performing quality of care review of services provided by risk-basis health maintenance organizations and competitive medical plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period.
    Fed Regist; 1987 Oct; 52(194):37454-8. PubMed ID: 10301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The OPEL study intent and content.
    Dobson A; Davis F
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Oct; 4(10):19-23. PubMed ID: 104222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO): assumption of Medicare review functions and coordination with Medicaid--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15312-35. PubMed ID: 10299989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The challenge: PSRO and optometry.
    Ruskiewicz J; Watters HC
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1976 Feb; 47(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 1036177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation.
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research and development in quality assurance. The experimental medical care review organization program.
    Sanazaro PJ; Goldstein RL; Roberts JS; Maglott DB; McAllister JW
    N Engl J Med; 1972 Nov; 287(22):1125-31. PubMed ID: 4343177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO); assumption of responsibilities and Medicare review functions and coordination of Medicaid with peer review organization--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29026-41. PubMed ID: 10299606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program.
    Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nurse participation in medical peer review.
    Orme JY; Lindbeck RS
    Nurs Outlook; 1974 Jan; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 4491913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concurrent quality assurance in hospital care. Report of a study by Private Initiative in PSRO.
    Sanazaro PJ; Worth RM
    N Engl J Med; 1978 May; 298(21):1171-7. PubMed ID: 349379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PSRO: a new direction for quality assessment in Otolaryngology.
    Coulthard SW
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1976; 82(4):ORL 413-6. PubMed ID: 986715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. PSRO: current status of the professional standards review organization program.
    Ellis GL
    Am J Occup Ther; 1976 Jul; 30(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 945943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.