BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10898841)

  • 1. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial.
    Elsyad MA; Ashmawy TM; Faramawy AG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 41(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 24354686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the edentulous maxilla with ball and telescopic attachments of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Elsyad MA; Khairallah AS; Shawky AF
    Quintessence Int; 2013 Jul; 44(7):487-95. PubMed ID: 23616978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination syndrome in relation to osseointegrated implant-supported overdentures: a survey.
    Lechner SK; Mammen A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 8630178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Residual ridge resorption in the edentulous maxilla in patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: an 8-year retrospective study.
    Kreisler M; Behneke N; Behneke A; d'Hoedt B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 12854795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
    Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
    Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different mandibular dentures on antagonistic maxillary ridge.
    Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Abdel-Ghany MM
    Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 18091171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients.
    Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept--a retrospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 18548933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment planning: implant-supported partial overdentures.
    Chee WW
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2005 Apr; 33(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 15915882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
    Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
    ELsyad MA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between occlusal force distribution in implant overdenture prostheses and residual ridge resorption.
    Khuder T; Yunus N; Sulaiman E; Ibrahim N; Khalid T; Masood M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 May; 44(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 28295492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 69.