450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10898848)
1. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
Cabral LM; Guedes CG
Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A strain gauge analysis of microstrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions.
Cerqueira NM; Ozcan M; Gonçalves M; da Rocha DM; Vasconcellos DK; Bottino MA; Yener-Salihoğlu E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 22442773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants.
Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Cardoso A; Rocha EP; Gomes EA
Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18784525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy of pickup implant impression: an in vitro comparison of novel modular versus standard custom trays.
Simeone P; Valentini PP; Pizzoferrato R; Scudieri F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 21691600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part I: comparison of three direct methods.
Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 22066473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The one-model technique: a new method for immediate loading with fixed prostheses in edentulous or potentially edentulous jaws.
Biscaro L; Becattelli A; Poggio PM; Soattin M; Rossini F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 19537470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Locating angulated abutments: a technical note.
Coward TJ; Watson RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 9048458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
